Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
=== Ensure that date/time formats are explicit === | |||
Make sure that Access explicitly looks for the format set out in [[Date and Time Format]], rather than using the PC format. | Make sure that Access explicitly looks for the format set out in [[Date and Time Format]], rather than using the PC format. | ||
{{Discussion}} | {{Discussion}} | ||
====Discussion==== | |||
*Right now [[CCMDB.mdb]] uses dd-mmm-yyyy, e.g. 12 Jan 2009. This is less ambiguous than the standard set out on the wiki. I think it's the better option since it eliminates the chance for transposition errors. I think we should use this format for collection. This does not affect how it is sent to Ed, or how it is stored in Ed's program. If Trish is OK with this, this section should be removed from the change log and [[Date and Time Format]] should be updated accordingly. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:58, 12 February 2009 (CST) | *Right now [[CCMDB.mdb]] uses dd-mmm-yyyy, e.g. 12 Jan 2009. This is less ambiguous than the standard set out on the wiki. I think it's the better option since it eliminates the chance for transposition errors. I think we should use this format for collection. This does not affect how it is sent to Ed, or how it is stored in Ed's program. If Trish is OK with this, this section should be removed from the change log and [[Date and Time Format]] should be updated accordingly. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:58, 12 February 2009 (CST) | ||
** starting the one-week clock to accept this change since it has not been disputed. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:44, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | ** starting the one-week clock to accept this change since it has not been disputed. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:44, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | ||
===APACHE II ACTIVE TX-eliminate this=== | |||
*ACCESS program is affected because it makes this a required field (though my understanding is that many data collectors have set default for boxed to be checked). | *ACCESS program is affected because it makes this a required field (though my understanding is that many data collectors have set default for boxed to be checked). | ||
*PDA Reader or master database utility programs are not affected if this field is left BLANK | *PDA Reader or master database utility programs are not affected if this field is left BLANK | ||
| Line 51: | Line 50: | ||
*Approved, leave blank. [[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 05:25, 19 January 2009 (CST) | *Approved, leave blank. [[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 05:25, 19 January 2009 (CST) | ||
{{Discussion}} | {{Discussion}} | ||
====Discussion==== | |||
* are you saying that ccmdb.mdb will not allow sending a pt with unchecked active tx? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:25, 11 February 2009 (CST) | * are you saying that ccmdb.mdb will not allow sending a pt with unchecked active tx? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:25, 11 February 2009 (CST) | ||
**'''YES'''.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:35, 9 March 2009 (CDT) | **'''YES'''.[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 13:35, 9 March 2009 (CDT) | ||
*** Where is this field in Access, I don't see it on the APACHE screen.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:44, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | *** Where is this field in Access, I don't see it on the APACHE screen.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:44, 23 April 2009 (CDT) | ||