ECIP: Difference between revisions

m We won't start this at this time. There was a second question on here that is already being dealt with on other page.
Line 5: Line 5:
We keep discussing whether [[EMIP]] like patients should be collected in Critical Care. Consensus is that they are rare, but for consistency it would be good if we caught them.  
We keep discussing whether [[EMIP]] like patients should be collected in Critical Care. Consensus is that they are rare, but for consistency it would be good if we caught them.  


{{DiscussTask
This was on the task team's list for a while but there was no appetite to start doing this.  
| Should we start to collect data on '''E'''mergency '''C'''ritical Care '''I'''n'''P'''atients (ECIPs)? And same for CAUs? For consistency etc? There should not be many.
}}


Email from Trish 2016-11-10:  
Email from Trish 2016-11-10:  
Line 15: Line 13:
:Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include.  I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU.
:Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include.  I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU.


=== CAU ===
 
{{discussion}}
We may need to consider patients who are in the [[Clinical Assessment Unit]]s for inclusion in ECIP/[[EMIP#CAU]].




[[Category:EMIP]]
[[Category:EMIP]]