Proposed Notes field default: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
DPageNewton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Some specific points: | Some specific points: | ||
{{Discussion}} | {{Discussion}} | ||
* The initial proposal was to use a date format "(mm/dd)" (ie (24/10)); I find that problematic because we don't use that format elsewhere and using an all number format is ambiguous; that's why I changed it to dd mmm (ie 24 Oct) which will always be clear. | * The initial proposal was to use a date format "(mm/dd)" (ie (24/10)); I find that problematic because we don't use that format elsewhere and using an all number format is ambiguous; that's why I changed it to dd mmm (ie 24 Oct) which will always be clear | ||
**I think this is a great idea. Personally, I always put the date AND time that I last reviewed a profile, so I know where I left off when it comes time to further review. Could we tweak it just a little more. Could we somehow add a time to the "read to" part. There can often be upward of 20 pages of epr notes to plow through in a single day. Having a time added would be very helpful. (As it stands now, I always include the time of my last review. [[User:DPageNewton|DPageNewton]] 07:20, 2018 October 25 (CDT) | |||