Function Validate Chart: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m (nothing changed, just confirming that the >8 digit check was being run.) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb | | DIC_app = CCMDB.mdb | ||
| DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | | DIC_coding = Function ''Validate_Chart'' | ||
| DIC_status = | | DIC_status = implemented | ||
| DIC_implementation_date = 2008-01-01 | | DIC_implementation_date = 2008-01-01 | ||
}} | }} | ||
The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown. | The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown. | ||
Revision as of 16:38, 2018 November 24
| Data Integrity Checks | |
| Summary: | validates the Chart number:
|
| Related: | PHIN, Chart number |
| Firmness: | hard check |
| Timing: | |
| App: | CCMDB.mdb |
| Coding: | Function Validate_Chart |
| Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
| Status: | implemented |
| Implementation Date: | 2008-01-01 |
| Backlogged: | true |
The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown.
Log
- 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date
Related articles
| Related articles: |