Query check CCI InExtubation consistent: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
JMojica (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
*** What I was trying to say is that I am worried this would be a false positive, which will then create work load for Pagasa and/or Collectors to confirm. Do we really want cross checks that bring up ''potential'' errors? We have talked about this before, but never really come up with a general answer. Should we take it to task meeting? Ttenbergen 23:45, 2018 October 29 (CDT)
*** What I was trying to say is that I am worried this would be a false positive, which will then create work load for Pagasa and/or Collectors to confirm. Do we really want cross checks that bring up ''potential'' errors? We have talked about this before, but never really come up with a general answer. Should we take it to task meeting? Ttenbergen 23:45, 2018 October 29 (CDT)
*** Are you saying I should use "difference between A and B can be -2, -1, 0, 1, 2. Other values will be questionable?  
*** Are you saying I should use "difference between A and B can be -2, -1, 0, 1, 2. Other values will be questionable?  
**** The basic scenarios are 1. no new insert and no extubation  (0-0=0) , 2. no new insert and then extubated - this assumes currently with tube and then extubated (0-1=-1), 3. insert new tube and no extubation(1-0=1), 4) insert new tube and then extubated (1-1=0).  When there are 2 insertions, the valid number of extubations =1,2,3 even if occurring at same or different days as insertion day, the difference will either be -1,0,1. Same holds true with 3 insertions or 4 insertions.  there will be definite errors if the difference is >= 2 or <= -2. Having  1 insertion and 3 extubations or 3 insertions and 1 extubation are not possible and are errors.
}}
}}


== Related articles ==
== Related articles ==
{{Related Articles}}
{{Related Articles}}