Proposed Notes field default: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Jvelasco (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


<pre>
<pre>
(mm dd HH:mm) - r/v
mm/dd(HH:mm)r/v
tiss - (mm dd HH:mm)
mm/dd(HH:mm)CCI
pharm - (mm dd HH:mm)
mm/dd(HH:mm)pharm
CCI - (mm dd HH:mm) (ie.picklist/components)
mm/dd(HH:mm)TISS
</pre>
</pre>


Line 22: Line 22:
* Just a suggestion:  instead of "read to" and "tiss checked to" use "r/v" and "tiss" (along with the date and time entry) these words alone should suffice and it leaves more room in the first line for other important entries that are specific to the patient. Also,if possible, can you put the pharm and labs entries on a second line? --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 07:42, 2018 October 31 (CDT)
* Just a suggestion:  instead of "read to" and "tiss checked to" use "r/v" and "tiss" (along with the date and time entry) these words alone should suffice and it leaves more room in the first line for other important entries that are specific to the patient. Also,if possible, can you put the pharm and labs entries on a second line? --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 07:42, 2018 October 31 (CDT)
*It is hard to standardize this across all collection areas and everyone's preferences, so I think making a default with all the above options is a good place to start. If the default can be customized (ex. some items can be deleted, or rearranged in a different order) than that would accommodate the individual needs of collectors. The idea is to create an efficient way to indicate where we've left off, because this will not be as obvious when we transition ICD10/CCI collection. We discussed this in our office and I 'tweaked" the above proposal again. Con also indicated that it is helpful to have the date written as (mm/dd) for sorting purposes on the main page. Can the date be customized as well?--[[User:Jvelasco|Jvelasco]] 13:47, 2018 October 31 (CDT)
*It is hard to standardize this across all collection areas and everyone's preferences, so I think making a default with all the above options is a good place to start. If the default can be customized (ex. some items can be deleted, or rearranged in a different order) than that would accommodate the individual needs of collectors. The idea is to create an efficient way to indicate where we've left off, because this will not be as obvious when we transition ICD10/CCI collection. We discussed this in our office and I 'tweaked" the above proposal again. Con also indicated that it is helpful to have the date written as (mm/dd) for sorting purposes on the main page. Can the date be customized as well?--[[User:Jvelasco|Jvelasco]] 13:47, 2018 October 31 (CDT)
*Having seen the implemented default, and reading everyone’s suggestions again, I am proposing the above tweak. This way, it’s a little shorter. Medicine collectors can delete the tiss and pharm if they want. CCI and pharm are together, and the r/v is at the top, which seems to be the common preference. I also changed the placement of the brackets, so it looks a little less busy. This is just an idea to clean it up a bit more, so please feel free to add your suggestions and tweaks.--[[User:Jvelasco|Jvelasco]] 11:34, 2018 November 13 (CST)


== Log ==
== Log ==