PatientFollow Project: Difference between revisions

m Text replacement - "CCMDB.mdb" to "CCMDB.accdb"
Line 32: Line 32:
=== What would be the actual chart number split per site and per collector ===
=== What would be the actual chart number split per site and per collector ===
We would essentially take the sum EFTs per program/site and consider them as 100%, and then assign the chart numbers based on that percentage. For example, if a site has 3 collectors that are each a .5EFT, each collector would get 33% of that site's new admissions, so collector A might get charts ending in 00-33, collector B 34-66, and collector C 67-99
We would essentially take the sum EFTs per program/site and consider them as 100%, and then assign the chart numbers based on that percentage. For example, if a site has 3 collectors that are each a .5EFT, each collector would get 33% of that site's new admissions, so collector A might get charts ending in 00-33, collector B 34-66, and collector C 67-99
{{Discuss|Actual split needs to be determined }}
 
As of Sept 2019 we are testing the split between medicine collectors at HSC.


=== Are chart numbers distributed equally and randomly? ===
=== Are chart numbers distributed equally and randomly? ===