PatientFollow Project: Difference between revisions

Line 53: Line 53:
| always= This would not be a problem.  
| always= This would not be a problem.  
| full= * We discussed whether different [[LOS]] will cause problems with this distribution of patients. We would expect LOS to be equally distributed across Chart Numbers; if it is we should be able to ignore it in distributing patients, since the “average” patient with an “average” chart number would have an “average” LOS.}}
| full= * We discussed whether different [[LOS]] will cause problems with this distribution of patients. We would expect LOS to be equally distributed across Chart Numbers; if it is we should be able to ignore it in distributing patients, since the “average” patient with an “average” chart number would have an “average” LOS.}}
=== How would patients be equitably shared across diffrent EFTs? ===
{{Discuss |
*I do not see how this way of splitting patients can be done on a fair and equitable basis. We do not all have the same EFT, and we don't all have nice simple .5 eft's. My eft is .65. Not quite as easy to fairly and equitably split.
**The division of workload should actually be easier using this method. If you are a .65 as opposed to a .5, then the chart numbers that are assigned to you would be equivilant to your EFT, so a .65 EFT would be assigned more of the chart numbers than a .5 EFT would be.[[User:Mlagadi|Mlagadi]] 12:24, 2019 September 5 (CDT)}}


=== How about EMIPs? ===
=== How about EMIPs? ===