Lab identification in the DSM data: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* <code>" WHERE ([Arrive_DtTm]<=" & LabDtTm_str & ") AND (" & LabDtTm_str & "<=nz([Dispo_DtTm],now())) "</code> | * <code>" WHERE ([Arrive_DtTm]<=" & LabDtTm_str & ") AND (" & LabDtTm_str & "<=nz([Dispo_DtTm],now())) "</code> | ||
** ie we start the range with the [[Arrive_DtTm]], not the [[Accept_DtTm]] | ** ie we start the range with the [[Arrive_DtTm]], not the [[Accept_DtTm]] | ||
{{Discuss |We should change this; however, do we only change it going forward or do we also re-import back data? Julie is about to re-import back data until 2019-01-01, so maybe we should reimport back data for all that far? | {{Discuss | | ||
* shouldn't it be [[Accept_DtTm]] and use [[Arrive_DtTm]] if [[Accept_DtTm]] is blank. We have discussed that in the Project Boarding Loc, we can still determine the counts in between [[Accept_DtTm]] and [[Arrive_DtTm]] if needed. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:25, 2019 December 10 (CST) }} | * We should change this; however, do we only change it going forward or do we also re-import back data? Julie is about to re-import back data until 2019-01-01, so maybe we should reimport back data for all that far? | ||
** shouldn't it be [[Accept_DtTm]] and use [[Arrive_DtTm]] if [[Accept_DtTm]] is blank. We have discussed that in the Project Boarding Loc, we can still determine the counts in between [[Accept_DtTm]] and [[Arrive_DtTm]] if needed. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:25, 2019 December 10 (CST) | |||
*** That is pretty much what I mean, it should be as you say. Do we want to do this going back in data as you re-import, or just going forward for future imports? Ttenbergen 09:41, 2019 December 11 (CST)}} | |||
=== counts === | === counts === | ||