Query check dispo lower acuity than location: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m link fix |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Data Integrity Check | {{Data Integrity Check | ||
| DIC_summary = check for patients going to lower level of care (based on [[S dispo table]].acuity_level) but without [[Transfer_Ready_DtTm]]; Check will launch an error but allow no date, ie it's just a reminder, see [[ | | DIC_summary = check for patients going to lower level of care (based on [[S dispo table]].acuity_level) but without [[Transfer_Ready_DtTm]]; Check will launch an error but allow no date, ie it's just a reminder, see [[Level of care hierarchy]]. | ||
| DIC_related_concepts = Transfer Ready DtTm field; Dispo field | | DIC_related_concepts = Transfer Ready DtTm field; Dispo field | ||
| DIC_firmness = soft check | | DIC_firmness = soft check |
Latest revision as of 16:02, 2020 October 15
Legacy Content
This page contains Legacy Content.- Explanation: no longer checked as per Eliminating distinction between different ward types
- Successor: No successor was entered
Click Expand to show legacy content.
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | check for patients going to lower level of care (based on S dispo table.acuity_level) but without Transfer_Ready_DtTm; Check will launch an error but allow no date, ie it's just a reminder, see Level of care hierarchy. |
Related: | Transfer Ready DtTm field, Dispo field |
Firmness: | soft check |
Timing: | complete |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | query check_dispo_lower_acuity_than_location and function Transfer_Ready_DtTm_vs_Location_vs_Dispo |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | retired |
Implementation Date: | 2016-06-06 |
Backlogged: | true |
Related articles
Related articles: |