Lab and culture reports: Difference between revisions

m moved info from here to Labs Complete which is what it was about.
m That's not really about cross checks for this, and there is no integrated way to list and keep updated cross checks related to this, so removing that info from this page.
Line 12: Line 12:
*The question arises of whether when you do NOT have any sort of lab identification of a bug, whether clinical suspicion is enough to "call it":
*The question arises of whether when you do NOT have any sort of lab identification of a bug, whether clinical suspicion is enough to "call it":
**Again, the answer is generally "Yes" with '''[[Infection with implied pathogen]]''', and generally "No" elsewise -- deviating from these generalities can be done if you've got an excellent, scientific rationale.
**Again, the answer is generally "Yes" with '''[[Infection with implied pathogen]]''', and generally "No" elsewise -- deviating from these generalities can be done if you've got an excellent, scientific rationale.
== Cross-checks ==
See [[Pathogens|CCDMB Data Integrity Checks on Pathogens page (needs review)]].


== Related articles ==  
== Related articles ==