Lab identification in the DSM data: Difference between revisions

JMojica (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
* We should change this; however, do we only change it going forward or do we also re-import back data? Julie is about to re-import back data until 2019-01-01, so maybe we should reimport back data for all that far?  
* We should change this; however, do we only change it going forward or do we also re-import back data? Julie is about to re-import back data until 2019-01-01, so maybe we should reimport back data for all that far?  
** shouldn't it be [[Accept_DtTm]] and use [[Arrive_DtTm]] if [[Accept_DtTm]] is blank. We have discussed that in the Project Boarding Loc, we can still determine the counts in between [[Accept_DtTm]] and [[Arrive_DtTm]] if needed.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:25, 2019 December 10 (CST)  
** shouldn't it be [[Accept_DtTm]] and use [[Arrive_DtTm]] if [[Accept_DtTm]] is blank. We have discussed that in the Project Boarding Loc, we can still determine the counts in between [[Accept_DtTm]] and [[Arrive_DtTm]] if needed.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 10:25, 2019 December 10 (CST)  
*** That is pretty much what I mean, it should be as you say. Do we want to do this going back in data as you re-import, or just going forward for future imports? Ttenbergen 09:41, 2019 December 11 (CST)}}
*** That is pretty much what I mean, it should be as you say. Do we want to do this going back in data as you re-import, or just going forward for future imports? Ttenbergen 09:41, 2019 December 11 (CST)
 
**** Yes going forward.  also this time using first service dttm.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:36, 2022 February 16 (CST)
}}
{{Todo  
{{Todo  
  | who = Tina
  | who = Tina