Query check CCI TISS NrDays GT LOS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "TISS28 checks" to "TISS28 check" |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[[Category:CCI]] | [[Category:CCI]] | ||
[[Category:CCI Px check]] | [[Category:CCI Px check]] | ||
[[Category:TISS28 | [[Category:TISS28 check]] | ||
[[Category:Registry checks]] | [[Category:Registry checks]] | ||
[[Category:Length of stay]] | [[Category:Length of stay]] | ||
[[Category:TISS28 timing checks]] | [[Category:TISS28 timing checks]] |
Revision as of 10:33, 2021 September 8
Data Integrity Checks | |
Summary: | There are more TISS Item Px_Dates than there are days between the first Service tmp entry and Dispo DtTm |
Related: | CCI Picklist, Service tmp entry, Dispo DtTm |
Firmness: | hard check |
Timing: | incomplete |
App: | CCMDB.accdb |
Coding: | query check_CCI_TISS_NrDays_GT_LOS |
Uses L Problem table: | not relevant for this app |
Status: | implemented |
Implementation Date: | 2021-01-21 |
Backlogged: | true |
This check can be done on incomplete records because even for those there is never a reason there would be extra TISS days.
Log
- 2021-01-21 - check defined and implemented