|
|
| Line 42: |
Line 42: |
|
| |
|
| === Special Case - cross-program boarding === | | === Special Case - cross-program boarding === |
| If a patient is accepted by your service, taken care of but '''remains at a location of a different service for some time''' before moving to your service, you need to enter a [[Boarding Loc]] entry for that period. That originating and different service location becomes the first Boarding loc. | | If a patient is accepted by your service, taken care of but '''remains at a location of a different service where we collect for some time''' before moving to your service, you need to enter a [[Boarding Loc]] entry for that period. That originating and different service location becomes the first Boarding loc. |
| {{Discuss|
| |
| what happens if a patient is accepted by your service and '''remains at a location of a different service for some time''' but '''not being taken care of by your service''' before moving to your service? will that originating and different service location still need to be enter as the first [[Boarding Loc]] entry ? Example from Medicine service to ICU service, the location of the Medicine service is <own site> ER (case of EMIP) or <own site> Med we collect, will the first boarding entry still be <own ER> or <own site> Med? Is the service taking care of the patient on that location of different service available and easy to know? --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 12:51, 2022 April 8 (CDT)
| |
| ** This was discussed at TASK, this can happen but it is rare. the conversation below this addresses it, doesn't it? Tina will add all the boarding locs [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:59, 2022 April 8 (CDT)}}
| |
| ----
| |
| *How should we handle this with the new implementation of using the actual location? we will add these to the critical care laptops? or leave as per the instructions [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 18:16, 2022 January 26 (CST)
| |
| ** Good question. I had hoped that [[Definition_of_a_Critical_Care_Laptop_Admission#From Code Blue]] would help, but all that says is that this should be rare. But clearly it could happen elsewhere. What do you mean by "leave as per the instruction"? Take to Task?
| |
| {{Todo
| |
| | who = Tina
| |
| | question = _dev_CCMDB
| |
| * Tina will add all options to the boarding loc list so we can enter what is actually true. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:59, 2022 February 17 (CST)
| |
| | todo_added = 2022-02-17
| |
| | todo_action = 2022-02-17
| |
| }}
| |
|
| |
|
| ----
| | '''For medicine pts boarding in ICU''' you can use the explicit ICU entry that applies because all CC locations are explicitly included in Boarding Loc. |
|
| |
|
| For Critical Care collection, this could happen if the team runs a code on a patient and accepts care for that patient, but for a period of time hasn't yet moved the patient. For Critical Care, you would enter a generic "<Site>_Med" "<Site>_Med" (ie [[GRA_Med]], [[HSC_Med]], [[STB_Med]]) for this patient so we don't have CC collectors keeping track of where regular, boarding or covid locations are. The generic "<Site>_Med" entry would only be available on CC laptops. | | '''For CC patients boarding on a Med ward where we collect''', enter "GRA_Med"/"HSC_Med"/"STB_Med" as applicable. We added these boarding loc options specifically for this scenario, and they are available only on CC laptops. |
|
| | |
| For Medicine laptops this isn't an issue because all CC locations are explicitly included in Boarding Loc.
| | {{Ex | This could happen if the team runs a code on a patient and accepts care for that patient, but for a period of time hasn't yet moved the patient. For Critical Care, you would enter a generic "<Site>_Med" "<Site>_Med" (ie [[GRA_Med]], [[HSC_Med]], [[STB_Med]]) for this patient so we don't have CC collectors keeping track of where regular, boarding or covid locations are.}} |
|
| |
|
| === Special Case - Erroneous Unit information in [[Cognos EPR Report]] === | | === Special Case - Erroneous Unit information in [[Cognos EPR Report]] === |