DC Treatment: Difference between revisions

Line 7:

* '''removed''' field from sending

* '''removed''' field from ccmdb_data

* once we have removed the weird data, change the size of this field to 2 from 50

* remove field from CFE data - if that's what Julie agrees to

* delete wiki page when done

}}

{{DJ |

{{Discuss | who = Pagasa | question =

* ~~Three of these contain weird~~ values~~; do we care?~~

* Pagasa, as confirmed by Julie please set the values in the DC field for the following entries to blank and update here when done.

D_ID SentDtTm R_dc_treat

STB_ACCU-30009 2016-Sep-16 06:35 c

HSC_SICa-767 2016-Aug-03 07:51 s

STB_CCU-29365 2015-Nov-04 10:14 Leslie

}}

{{DJ |

* Do we want to keep this field in CFE or transfer the "DC" values into the new spot, and what would that be?

** ~~delete the weird values.~~ maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER and move to TMS legacy. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)}}

** maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER and move to TMS legacy. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)

** I meant putting the value into however we encode the concept now. Is that palliative? Not really, I guess. If it's not consistent with what we do now then we should keep it as is. I will change it to a much smaller field (currently 50 char, will become 2), at which point keeping it in centralized will be fine. Or do you know of a spot where we collect the new concept now? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:31, 2022 August 23 (CDT)

}}

{{LegacyContent

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * '''removed''' field from sending
 * '''removed''' field from ccmdb_data
+* once we have removed the weird data, change the size of this field to 2 from 50
 * remove field from CFE data - if that's what Julie agrees to
 * delete wiki page when done
 }}
-{{DJ |
+{{Discuss | who = Pagasa | question =
-* Three of these contain weird values; do we care?
+* Pagasa, as confirmed by Julie please set the values in the DC field for the following entries to blank and update here when done.
   D_ID	SentDtTm	R_dc_treat
   STB_ACCU-30009	2016-Sep-16 06:35	c
   HSC_SICa-767	2016-Aug-03 07:51	s
   STB_CCU-29365	2015-Nov-04 10:14	Leslie
+}}
+{{DJ |
 * Do we want to keep this field in CFE or transfer the "DC" values into the new spot, and what would that be?
-** delete the weird values. maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER  and move to TMS legacy. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)}}
+** maybe make a new table L_DC and another for L_FILTER  and move to TMS legacy. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:20, 2022 August 12 (CDT)
+** I meant putting the value into however we encode the concept now. Is that palliative? Not really, I guess. If it's not consistent with what we do now then we should keep it as is. I will change it to a much smaller field (currently 50 char, will become 2), at which point keeping it in centralized will be fine. Or do you know of a spot where we collect the new concept now? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:31, 2022 August 23 (CDT)
+}}
 {{LegacyContent