LAU collection readmission data: Difference between revisions

Line 20:

* '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm

* Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used

{{DT|If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST)

{{DT|

* do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST)}}

* If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST)

** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST)

* do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST)

** [[Readmission to MedWard]] only considers it a re-admission if they left the hospital setting in between. Is that what you mean here, that they were in an ICU, went home and then came to LAU? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) }}

==== Sources ====

* History and physical

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 * '''Project: LAU Readm''' - Item: "has later" - Date/Time: that admission's service start_dttm
 * Checkbox, Integer, Real, Comment: not used
-{{DT|If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST)
+{{DT|
-* do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST)}}
+* If the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review?, do we still enter the tmp project? or will you connect the two admissions when analyzing the data? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 19:07, 4 March 2025 (CST)
+** I think we should, that way the stats are more straightfwd for this. But we may want to know more about what the other admission was. Do we want to have more items, such as "previous med" or "later ICU"? [[Readmission to MedWard]] says "Readmission is attributed to the site or hospital from which the patient was discharged. "; so we would not need details for the future site, but might want them for the previous, even if we only did as little as "same" and "other". [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST)
+* do we include readmission if the previous admission was ICU? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 11:39, 5 March 2025 (CST)
+** [[Readmission to MedWard]] only considers it a re-admission if they left the hospital setting in between. Is that what you mean here, that they were in an ICU, went home and then came to LAU? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 19:00, 5 March 2025 (CST) }}
 ==== Sources ====
 * History and physical