LAU collection readmission data: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
== Data Collection ==
== Data Collection ==
* For any record collected as part of [[LAU Collection Project]], consider whether there is an indication of a previous admission for which this is a re-admission, or a subsequent admission that is a re-admission for this admission.  
* For any record collected as part of [[LAU Collection Project]], consider whether there is an indication of a previous admission for which this is a re-admission, or a subsequent admission that is a re-admission for this admission.  
* To decide if something is a re-admission, follow the criteria in [[Readmission to MedWard]]
* To decide if something is a re-admission, follow the criteria in [[Readmission to MedWard]]
 
{{DL|  
{{DT| We need to decide if we will use the criteria set out in [[Readmission to MedWard]] The criteria may be too restrictive for the LAU project.   
* We need to decide if we will use the criteria set out in [[Readmission to MedWard]] The criteria may be too restrictive for the LAU project.   
* waiting for Dan to weigh in }}
** waiting for Dan to weigh in }}


=== Data Entry Instructions ===   
=== Data Entry Instructions ===   
Line 29: Line 30:


==== Special case - both admission and re-admission are part of the LAU collection ====
==== Special case - both admission and re-admission are part of the LAU collection ====
*Even if the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review, still enter the tmp project. This will make the stats more straightfwd.  
* Even if the first admission and the readmission are part of our current review, still enter the tmp project. This will make the stats more straightfwd.  
*Enter this even if the partner-record is also part of the [[LAU Collection Project]]; yes, we would be able to find that re-admission in our usual way, but having all the data coded the same way will make it more consistent to analyze.  
* Enter this even if the partner-record is also part of the [[LAU Collection Project]]; yes, we would be able to find that re-admission in our usual way, but having all the data coded the same way will make it more consistent to analyze.  


==== Special case - previous unit is an inpatient location ====
==== Special case - previous unit is an inpatient location ====
*If the [[Previous Location]] was an inpatient location then the record doesn't meet criteria for [[Readmission to MedWard]], so '''don't''' mark it as a re-admission.
*If the [[Previous Location]] was an inpatient location then the record doesn't meet criteria for [[Readmission to MedWard]], so mark it as "no previous"/"no later".


==== Sources ====
==== Sources ====
Line 42: Line 43:


== Log ==
== Log ==
* 2025-03-09 - added "no previous"/"no later", "later not entered"/"previous not entered"; updatede [[query check_LAU_collection_readmission_data ]]
* 2025-03-06
* 2025-03-06
** implemented
** implemented