Hospital previous: Difference between revisions

TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
**In addition to the Manitoba hospital number codes there are codes that can be use for patient who are admitted from outside of the province, country or continent.
**In addition to the Manitoba hospital number codes there are codes that can be use for patient who are admitted from outside of the province, country or continent.


Possible values for the Hospital Previous field are stored in [[S Hospitals]].
Possible values for the Hospital Previous field are stored in [[S HospitalPrevious]].


== Implementation Date ==
== Admission from ER at other hospitals ==
*September 14, 1998
{{Discussion}}
*In medicine, if a patient comes from another hospital for example from Gimli ER, then the pt goes to the ER at your hospital, do you put the Gimli code in the '''hospital previous''' slot?  I assume for medicine that the '''admit from''' would still need to be '''from ER''' at your own hospital in order to capture the moves and delays.  In the ICU program we would not do this as our admit from is the place of first entry to the hospital system, in this case our admit from would be XE and Gimli would be put in the hospital previous slot. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 10:55, 19 March 2009 (CDT)
**In the above case... "admitted from XE" if the intention was to directly admit from the sending facility. Then in the tmp file put in the move time to the ward. At the bottom of the tmp file put "parked in ER".
*** This is also discussed in [[Direct Admission]] , I believe. Are those the same concept? If so, I think we should pull that into a separate article since it affects all of [[Admit From & Discharged To]], this article and also [[Admit, Transfer and Discharge date and time]][[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:19, 17 September 2009 (CDT) I still don't think I understand this well enough to figure out how to split these articles. Could someone who does please re-distribute this as '''content''' rather than discussion to one of the above (or possibly other) articles? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:35, 2 November 2010 (CDT)
 
== Data integrity check on sending ==
*If you forget to enter a hospital previous code when X* or Y* are coded as "''admit from''", you will get an error message in ACCESS and will be unable to send your files the the regional server.


==History==
==History/Legacy==
*these codes that were used by Manitoba Health- they were provide by Dr. Carla Crusch when she was doing research in regards hospital utilization.
*these codes that were used by Manitoba Health- they were provide by Dr. Carla Crusch when she was doing research in regards hospital utilization.


== Data integrity check on sending ==
=== Implementation Date ===
*If you forget to enter a hospital previous code when X* or Y* are coded as "''admit from''", you will get an error message in ACCESS and will be unable to send your files the the regional server.
*September 14, 1998


== Legacy ==  
== Legacy ==  
Line 44: Line 50:




 
[[Category: Legacy Data]]
{{Discussion}}
*In medicine, If a patient comes from another hospital for example from Gimli ER, then the pt goes to the ER at your hospital, do you put the Gimli code in the '''hospital previous''' slot?  I assume for medicine that the '''admit from''' would still need to be '''from ER''' at your own hospital in order to capture the moves and delays.  In the ICU program we would not do this as our admit from is the place of first entry to the hospital system, in this case our admit from would be XE and Gimli would be put in the hospital previous slot. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 10:55, 19 March 2009 (CDT)
**In the above case... "admitted from XE" if the intention was to directly admit from the sending facility.Then in the tmp file put in the move time to the ward. At the bottom of the tmp file put "parked in ER".
*** This is also discussed in [[]] as a direct admit, I believe. Are those the same concept? If so, I think we should pull that into a separate article since it affects all of [[Admit From & Discharged To]], this article and also [[Admit, Transfer and Discharge date and time]][[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:19, 17 September 2009 (CDT)
 
* The city hospitals and extended care places are still listed on PDA and in [[CCMDB.mdb]]. Should they not be taken out? Is there any reason to keep them? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:19, 17 September 2009 (CDT)
**Yes, take out, if not already done. --[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:06, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
 
 
[[Category:Legacy Data]]
[[Category: Critical Care Element]]
[[Category: Critical Care Element]]
[[Category: Medicine Elements]]
[[Category: Medicine Elements]]
[[Category:Data_Collection_Guide]]
[[Category: Data_Collection_Guide]]
[[Category: Registry Data]]
[[Category: Registry Data]]
[[Category:Data Integrity Rules]]
[[Category: Data Integrity Rules]]
[[Category: Questions General Collection]]
[[Category: Questions General Collection]]