Transfer Ready date and time: Difference between revisions

Line 72:

*This has been my approach as well. [[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 08:16, 2015 September 24 (CDT)

*Does noncompliancy or a home care hold or all the reasons above change the fact that the pt is medically stable/ transfer ready would this be more of a discharge issue? (no place to go) The patient is ready to go home and for what ever reaons cant do CIVP Do we look at CIVP as a long term treatment like a foot ulcer? I guess I am saying is does the patient becomes Transfer ready once the acute phase of treatment is over and the pt is medically stable (no wbc elevation/ no temp/ vs stable ect )and treatment is no longer acute but chronic? ps just asking shirley

* I code the same as Pam and Michelle but know exactly what your talking about Shirley, because if CIVP could be arranged more quickly than the patient would be discharged, so it is a barrier to discharge [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:48, 2015 September 28 (CDT)

*Good points, a suggestion then is that for patients who are accepted to the CIVP program and are otherwise ready/able to discharge could be considered "CIVP holds" and the transfer ready date/time would be the date/time the patient was accepted to the CIVP as the barrier to discharge is systemic in origin (wait for service to be put in place).For patients who are accepted to the CIVP program but are unable to discharge due to patient based problems such as addictions, mental health or other active phsiological problems the transfer ready date/time would be the date/time of physician discharge order.[[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 07:33, 2015 September 29 (CDT)

== Sources ==

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 *This has been my approach as well. [[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 08:16, 2015 September 24 (CDT)
 *Does noncompliancy or a home care hold or all the reasons above change the fact that the pt is medically stable/ transfer ready would this be more of a discharge issue? (no place to go) The patient is ready to go home and for what ever reaons cant do CIVP  Do we look at CIVP  as a long term treatment  like a foot ulcer? I guess I am saying is does the patient  becomes Transfer ready once the acute phase of treatment is over and the pt is medically stable (no wbc elevation/ no temp/ vs stable ect )and treatment is no longer acute but chronic?  ps just asking shirley
+* I code the same as Pam and Michelle but know exactly what your talking about Shirley, because if CIVP could be arranged more quickly than the patient would be discharged, so it is a barrier to discharge [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 13:48, 2015 September 28 (CDT)
+ *Good points, a suggestion then is that for patients who are accepted to the CIVP program and are otherwise ready/able to discharge could be considered "CIVP holds" and the transfer ready  date/time  would be the date/time the patient was accepted to the CIVP as the barrier to discharge is systemic in origin (wait for service to be put in place).For patients who are accepted to the CIVP program but are unable to discharge due to patient based problems such as addictions, mental health or other active phsiological problems the transfer ready date/time would be the date/time of physician discharge order.[[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 07:33, 2015 September 29 (CDT)
 == Sources ==