|
|
| Line 53: |
Line 53: |
| If ACP M is just written with no qualifiers then one would classify as ACP M-. | | If ACP M is just written with no qualifiers then one would classify as ACP M-. |
|
| |
|
| ==Question==
| |
| *Just wondering if there is a reason that there are 2 pre-populated entries for ACP source in CCMDB?? Most patient will only have one entry for source and one for status so we frequently have to delete the second entry. I think it would be easier to just pre-populate one entry of each (status and source) and then if there are more than one, we can just add it. This is my opinion. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 12:25, 2016 May 19 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| *Asking if data collectors would find it be beneficial/useful to have a "sort" button available for numerical ordering of ACP status entries similar to the "sort" button in place for admitting dx and acquired complications? [[User:Ppiche|Pamela Piche]] 09:50, 2016 May 20 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| **I would find this very helpful - going back to review the ACP status is difficult when they are sorted based on the 1st entry. [[User:Mschaffer|Mschaffer]] 09:04, 2016 May 31 (CDT)
| |
| *I agree that this would be helpful and had also thought about it.--[[User:Jpeterson|Jpeterson]] 08:59, 2016 June 2 (CDT)
| |
| == WRHA guidelines / forms == | | == WRHA guidelines / forms == |
| *[http://www.wrha.mb.ca/acp/files/Workbook.pdf WRHA ACP Guidelines/workbook] | | *[http://www.wrha.mb.ca/acp/files/Workbook.pdf WRHA ACP Guidelines/workbook] |