Combined ICD10 codes: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
{{Trauma w mechanism}}
{{Trauma w mechanism}}


=== '''NOT YET FIGURED OUT''' ===
=== Fractures ===
see also [[Coding fractures in ICD10]]
see also [[Coding fractures in ICD10]]
{{discussion}} others?
{{discussion}} not yet integrated...


=== Other co-codes? ===
{{discussion}} Are there others? What are they?
== '''NOT YET FIGURED OUT''' ==
* {{discussion}} Tina needs to import the >1 needed codes
* {{discussion}} Tina needs to import the >1 needed codes
** they are already in there, but must fix template to show them right


{{Discuss@task | <discuss causes of the diagnosis to be combined and how to determine the primary diagnosis (ie.obstructive uropathy with causes)>}}
{{Discuss@task | <discuss causes of the diagnosis to be combined and how to determine the primary diagnosis (ie.obstructive uropathy with causes)>}}

Revision as of 13:40, 2017 November 16

To code some diagnoses as part of ICD10 collection, several lines of entries in the Patient viewer tab ICD10 need to be grouped together.

To group diagnoses together, use the same Dx Priority for all of them.

Coding instructions

Metastasis

Template:Combined dx metastasis primary

Antibiotic Resistance

Template:Combined dx AB resistance

Trauma with mechanism

Template:Trauma w mechanism

Fractures

see also Coding fractures in ICD10 Template:Discussion not yet integrated...

Other co-codes?

Template:Discussion Are there others? What are they?


NOT YET FIGURED OUT

  • Template:Discussion Tina needs to import the >1 needed codes
    • they are already in there, but must fix template to show them right


Template:Discuss@task

Transition notes

Yes, this different from how we used to use dx priorities where they had to be unique.

Data

The records are combined by same L_ICD10.Dx Priority.