Query check long transfer delay: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{discussion}} There was a suggestion to omit the error if the notes box has a comment. That makes me think: we use this method for other checks, but I don't actually know how powerful it is, since most collectors use notes for all sorts of things, and some will leave the content when they are ready to send. If we are serious about this we might want to require them to put an entry into the tmp field instead. Is it worth adding one more entry to that? Guess it depends partly on how common the scenario is. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:44, 2018 June 7 (CDT) | {{discussion}} There was a suggestion to omit the error if the notes box has a comment. That makes me think: we use this method for other checks, but I don't actually know how powerful it is, since most collectors use notes for all sorts of things, and some will leave the content when they are ready to send. If we are serious about this we might want to require them to put an entry into the tmp field instead. Is it worth adding one more entry to that? Guess it depends partly on how common the scenario is. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:44, 2018 June 7 (CDT) | ||
== Related Articles == | |||
{{Related Articles}} | |||
[[Category: Admit/Discharge]] | [[Category: Admit/Discharge]] | ||
[[Category: Transfer Ready]] | [[Category: Transfer Ready]] | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 2018 June 7
This is a check to ensure that patients with a long Transfer Delay are not errors.
The following is still under discussion and not yet implemented! When done also update the cross check info in Transfer Delay, Transfer Ready DtTm field and Dispo DtTm field
Any patient with a transfer delay longer than Template:Discussion what? will launch an error when the dispo tab checkbox is checked.
Template:Discussion There was a suggestion to omit the error if the notes box has a comment. That makes me think: we use this method for other checks, but I don't actually know how powerful it is, since most collectors use notes for all sorts of things, and some will leave the content when they are ready to send. If we are serious about this we might want to require them to put an entry into the tmp field instead. Is it worth adding one more entry to that? Guess it depends partly on how common the scenario is. Thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:44, 2018 June 7 (CDT)