Check Renal Tasks: Difference between revisions

Line 35:

* Since we only check patients with LOS>3, do we need to consider this? If a pt with CRF/ARF is in hospital longer than 3 days would dialysis not need to be accommodated? IE, would the patient then not need to be sent to a different hospital that can dialyze? Ttenbergen 21:02, 2014 April 30 (CDT)

* from [[! Automated Data Integrity Checks]]:

**there are exceptions: If Grace and VIC Med send patient for dialysis to HSC or STB, then they return back to medicine bed, TASK will be marked with dialysis for their site. (As per Trish, I think)

*** Except those, community sites should not have dialysis task, right? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:14, 27 October 2008 (CDT)

Line 51:

Line 50:

* Could any of (e) or (f) be OK if the patient is palliative? (Tina)

** Yes. Found cases of palliative with dialysis. (Julie)

*** Yes, but could a palliative patient not also arrive and not get dialysis even if they are CRF? (Tina~~)(all from old discussion during [[! Automated Data Integrity Checks]]~~)

*** Yes, but could a palliative patient not also arrive and not get dialysis even if they are CRF? (Tina)

****yes we have cases where this has occurred, ie CRF in comorbid but no dialysis task entered if not dialyzed during the admission secondary to palliation[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:25, 2017 April 26 (CDT)

**** yes we have cases where this has occurred, ie CRF in comorbid but no dialysis task entered if not dialyzed during the admission secondary to palliation[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:25, 2017 April 26 (CDT)

***** Would all the pts like this have either Palliation or Comfort Care marked? That would mean I could exclude them from the check "if you have dx you must have task"...

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 {{discussion}}
 * Since we only check patients with LOS>3, do we need to consider this? If a pt with CRF/ARF is in hospital longer than 3 days would dialysis not need to be accommodated? IE, would the patient then not need to be sent to a different hospital that can dialyze? Ttenbergen 21:02, 2014 April 30 (CDT)
-* from [[! Automated Data Integrity Checks]]:
 **there are exceptions: If Grace and VIC Med send patient for dialysis to HSC or STB, then they return back to medicine bed, TASK will be marked with dialysis for their site. (As per Trish, I think)
 *** Except those, community sites should not have dialysis task, right? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:14, 27 October 2008 (CDT)
@@ Line 51: / Line 50: @@
 * Could any of (e) or (f) be OK if the patient is palliative? (Tina)
 ** Yes. Found cases of palliative with dialysis. (Julie)
-*** Yes, but could a palliative patient not also arrive and not get dialysis even if they are CRF? (Tina)(all from old discussion during [[! Automated Data Integrity Checks]])
+*** Yes, but could a palliative patient not also arrive and not get dialysis even if they are CRF? (Tina)
-****yes we have cases where this has occurred, ie CRF in comorbid but no dialysis task entered if not dialyzed during the admission secondary to palliation[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:25, 2017 April 26 (CDT)
+**** yes we have cases where this has occurred, ie CRF in comorbid but no dialysis task entered if not dialyzed during the admission secondary to palliation[[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 12:25, 2017 April 26 (CDT)
 ***** Would all the pts like this have either Palliation or Comfort Care marked? That would mean I could exclude them from the check "if you have dx you must have task"...
 {{discussion}}