Check pre acute consistent: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
I rely on the combination of [[pre acute living situation]], [[Previous Location]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Dispo]] fields '''to identified new or already PCH residents''' prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that '''[[Assisted Living]] and [[Supportive Housing]] are not [[PCH]] and must be entered as simply HOME''' as confirmed by Dr Roberts. | I rely on the combination of [[pre acute living situation]], [[Previous Location]], [[Postal Code]] and [[Dispo]] fields '''to identified new or already PCH residents''' prior to admission. Data collectors must understand that '''[[Assisted Living]] and [[Supportive Housing]] are not [[PCH]] and must be entered as simply HOME''' as confirmed by Dr Roberts. | ||
As per email from Julie: | |||
<pre> | |||
I have asked Pagasa to audit some records where the postal code matches with the PCH Facility. In most of these cases, Pagasa found that EPR addresses (no and street) match with the PCH facility’s addresses but the Pre-acute living situation =’Apartment’ instead of ‘Personal Care Home’ . this is possible because the address has the same format ‘Suite# - No and Street Name’ . | |||
PCH resident data prior to admission is not only being used in Medicine but also needed in Critical Care. | |||
Tina, is it possible to ask at entry level, say, – the postal code matches with a PCH facility (show the PCH address) but the pre-living situation entered is not ‘Personal Care Home’ , is this correct? I suppose DCs are getting the postal code from EPR where the exact address is also visible. | |||
</pre> | |||
== Related articles == | == Related articles == | ||