Query check ICD10 mechanism vs trauma: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

== False positives ==

{{DA | Now that this query is actually running (as of May 9) we are getting false positives where the following medical or iatrogenic things are asking for a mechanism:

{{DA |

*[[Respiratory tract, foreign body in]]

* Now that this query is actually running (as of May 9) we are getting false positives where the following medical or iatrogenic things are asking for a mechanism:

* [[Rib, fracture, injury/trauma]] (eg. in context of CPR)

** [[Respiratory tract, foreign body in]]

*[[Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, dialysis catheter]]

** [[Rib, fracture, injury/trauma]] (eg. in context of CPR)

Laura suggested using [[Mechanism of injury: other NOS]], but do we want something more specific.

** [[Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, dialysis catheter]]

** Another possibility would be to introduce the concept of "potential trauma" and change the cross check similar to potential infection. We would need to identify all dxs on the wiki that are potential traumas and might need to be coded with mechanisms. Or, we could decide to do away with this cross check because it's too much trouble? Ttenbergen 20:28, 2019 May 27 (CDT)}}

* Laura suggested using [[Mechanism of injury: other NOS]], but do we want something more specific?

* See [[:Category:Iatrogenic mechanism]] for another curve ball... some of those may need to be ''allowed'' (but not required) as mechanisms - or do they?

* Another possibility would be to introduce the concept of "potential trauma" and change the cross check similar to potential infection. We would need to identify all dxs on the wiki that are potential traumas and might need to be coded with mechanisms. Or, we could decide to do away with this cross check because it's too much trouble? Ttenbergen 20:28, 2019 May 27 (CDT)}}

{{DiscussTask | see DA above if this has not been addressed before Task. }}

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 == False positives ==
-{{DA | Now that this query is actually running (as of May 9) we are getting false positives where the following medical or iatrogenic things are asking for a mechanism:
+{{DA |
-*[[Respiratory tract, foreign body in]]
+* Now that this query is actually running (as of May 9) we are getting false positives where the following medical or iatrogenic things are asking for a mechanism:
-* [[Rib, fracture, injury/trauma]] (eg. in context of CPR)
+** [[Respiratory tract, foreign body in]]
-*[[Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, dialysis catheter]]
+** [[Rib, fracture, injury/trauma]] (eg. in context of CPR)
-Laura suggested using [[Mechanism of injury: other NOS]], but do we want something more specific.
+** [[Iatrogenic, mechanical complication/dysfunction, dialysis catheter]]
-** Another possibility would be to introduce the concept of "potential trauma" and change the cross check similar to potential infection. We would need to identify all dxs on the wiki that are potential traumas and might need to be coded with mechanisms. Or, we could decide to do away with this cross check because it's too much trouble? Ttenbergen 20:28, 2019 May 27 (CDT)}}
+* Laura suggested using [[Mechanism of injury: other NOS]], but do we want something more specific?
+* See [[:Category:Iatrogenic mechanism]] for another curve ball... some of those may need to be ''allowed'' (but not required) as mechanisms - or do they?
+* Another possibility would be to introduce the concept of "potential trauma" and change the cross check similar to potential infection. We would need to identify all dxs on the wiki that are potential traumas and might need to be coded with mechanisms. Or, we could decide to do away with this cross check because it's too much trouble? Ttenbergen 20:28, 2019 May 27 (CDT)}}
 {{DiscussTask | see DA above if this has not been addressed before Task. }}