Function Validate Chart: Difference between revisions

From CCMDB Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:


== Log ==
== Log ==
* 2019-08-22 - PL_Chart_9_Digit
* 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] triggers again
* 2019-08-22 - [[PL Chart 9 Digit]] was triggered even though this check exists
* 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date
* 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date



Revision as of 11:46, 2019 September 16

Data Integrity Checks
Summary: validates the Chart number:
  • Chart must be numerical
  • chart must be
  • checks Function PHIN same as Chart
  • no further checks at this time because chart numbers are different at different hospitals
Related: PHIN, Chart number
Firmness: hard check
Timing:
App: CCMDB.mdb
Coding: Function Validate_Chart
Uses L Problem table: not relevant for this app
Status: implemented
Implementation Date: 2008-01-01
Backlogged: true
  • Cargo


  • SMW
"CCMDB.mdb" is not in the list (CCMDB.accdb, Centralized data front end.accdb, TISS28.accdb, SAP, DSM Labs Consistency check.accdb, not entered) of allowed values for the "DICApp" property. 
  • Categories: 
  • form:

The numerical-check is relevant because the field is stored as a string. Reason unknown.

Log

  • 2019-09-15 - Confirmed again that this check seems to hold; asked Pagasa to flag if PL Chart 9 Digit triggers again
  • 2019-08-22 - PL Chart 9 Digit was triggered even though this check exists
  • 2008-01-01 - Approximate implementation date

Related articles

Related articles: