Lab and culture reports: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) Wiki has inconsistencies about when to code as treated vs. code as confirmed. If you can think of pages with this info, please put a link into this question. |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*For [[Cadham]] results, usually wait 2 weeks. | *For [[Cadham]] results, usually wait 2 weeks. | ||
**Note, Cadham sends initial and final results. Don't use the initial ones, only use the final ones. | **Note, Cadham sends initial and final results. Don't use the initial ones, only use the final ones. | ||
{{ | {{DT | This said: | ||
*''As above, if you don't get a presumptive pathogen and it's not a situation which relates to '''[[Infection with implied pathogen]]''', you should then use '''[[Infectious organism, unknown]]'''.'' | *''As above, if you don't get a presumptive pathogen and it's not a situation which relates to '''[[Infection with implied pathogen]]''', you should then use '''[[Infectious organism, unknown]]'''.'' | ||
** That seems inconsistent with elsewhere where we say "code as treated". I suspect we have other spots on the wiki where this is answered inconsistenly. '''If anyone else can think of a place, please add a link to that page here.''' }} | ** That seems inconsistent with elsewhere where we say "code as treated". I suspect we have other spots on the wiki where this is answered inconsistenly. '''If anyone else can think of a place, please add a link to that page here.''' | ||
** Tina needs to move this where this info actually lives and integrate it. The details are likely already there. }} | |||
== Does the lab complete checkbox mean this is complete? == | == Does the lab complete checkbox mean this is complete? == | ||