2020-10 EMIP changes: Difference between revisions

Line 17:

** this means that if the patient is later moved to a unit we collect (ie turns out to not be an EMIP after all), you can just enter that next location as an additional Boarding Loc entry, with that one having the same Boarding Loc Dt Tm as our [[Arrive DtTm]]

{{Discuss| For those that do move to a unit where we collect can we not just take out all the tmp boarding entries and just treat it as a regular admission? i.e. have an accept and arrive time to the home unit location, is there a reason why we need all the tmp boarding entries in these cases? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 07:40, 2020 October 9 (CDT)

{{Discuss| For those that do move to a unit where we collect can we not just take out all the tmp boarding entries and just treat it as a regular admission? i.e. have an accept and arrive time to the home unit location, is there a reason why we need all the tmp boarding entries in these cases? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 07:40, 2020 October 9 (CDT) }}

* I agree with Lisa. if the physical locations of patient are ER followed by home unit location, the accept and arrive date time will imply the corresponding arrival at ER and arrival at home unit. the tmp boarding is the default no borrow.

** now for EMIP. the accept datetime is the same as arrive datetime. but these same dates also happen in NON_EMIP. so how will I identify the EMIP's in the new rule - there must be an entry ER in the boarding loc. OR Option2, no more entry ER in the boarding loc, we keep the ACCEPT datetime the same definition but the ARRIVE datetime=DISPO datetime - since actually there was no arrival in the home unit. I think I like Option2. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 11:18, 2020 October 9 (CDT)

}}

== Background ==

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ** this means that if the patient is later moved to a unit we collect (ie turns out to not be an EMIP after all), you can just enter that next location as an additional Boarding Loc entry, with that one having the same Boarding Loc Dt Tm as our [[Arrive DtTm]]
-{{Discuss| For those that do move to a unit where we collect can we not just take out all the tmp boarding entries and just treat it as a regular admission?  i.e. have an accept and arrive time to the home unit location, is there a reason why we need all the tmp boarding entries in these cases? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 07:40, 2020 October 9 (CDT)
+{{Discuss| For those that do move to a unit where we collect can we not just take out all the tmp boarding entries and just treat it as a regular admission?  i.e. have an accept and arrive time to the home unit location, is there a reason why we need all the tmp boarding entries in these cases? [[User:Lkaita|Lisa Kaita]] 07:40, 2020 October 9 (CDT) }}
-* I agree with Lisa. if the physical locations of patient are ER followed by home unit location, the accept and arrive date time will imply the corresponding arrival at ER and arrival at home unit.  the tmp boarding  is the default no borrow.
-** now for EMIP.  the accept datetime is the same as arrive datetime.  but these same dates also happen in NON_EMIP.  so how will I identify the EMIP's in the new rule - there must be an entry ER in the boarding loc.  OR Option2,   no more  entry ER in the boarding loc, we keep the ACCEPT datetime the same definition but the  ARRIVE datetime=DISPO datetime - since actually there was no arrival in the home unit.  I think I like Option2.   --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 11:18, 2020 October 9 (CDT)
-}}
 == Background ==