Boarding Loc: Difference between revisions

Line 24:

**** Flagging this: if we don't enter the actual unit start dttm (ie might be before service start) then these won't line up with Cognos data, so will not proberly show up as having been entered. I think the actual unit start should be used and any stripping out of times is a matter of reporting. The corresponding entry in [[Service tmp entry]] will need to be updated accordingly. Ttenbergen 13:21, 2020 November 9 (CST)

***** why do we need to collect information which are not directly related to CC or Int Med patients? regardless where we save the data, we should be consistent. that is how we crosscheck errors (whether it is time,location, diagnosis, procedures). Is this a common situation or rare? if rare, then let it be an exception with Cognos data (e.g. not line up). if common, let us discuss in Task. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 15:08, 2020 November 9 (CST)

****** We should collect the real data rather than a made-up construct for two reasons: (1) it makes the meaning/definition of the date uniform: when the pt arrived on that unit as per ADT; if we collect it as you suggest then the meaning will be "either when they arrived or when they became our service"; so, more complicated definition, and it would re-encode something we already encode in service tmp instead. (2) If we encode some made-up date and time for unit start, then it will not link with the data in Cognos, so will always look as if not entered yet. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:50, 2020 November 18 (CST)

}}

** checkbox: not used for this project

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 **** Flagging this: if we don't enter the actual unit start dttm (ie might be before service start) then these won't line up with Cognos data, so will not proberly show up as having been entered. I think the actual unit start should be used and any stripping out of times is a matter of reporting. The corresponding entry in [[Service tmp entry]] will need to be updated accordingly.  Ttenbergen 13:21, 2020 November 9 (CST)
 ***** why do we need to collect information which are not directly related to CC or Int Med patients?  regardless where we save the data, we should be consistent. that is how we crosscheck errors (whether it is time,location, diagnosis, procedures).  Is this a common situation or rare? if rare, then let it be an exception with Cognos data  (e.g. not line up).  if common, let us discuss in Task.  --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 15:08, 2020 November 9 (CST)
+****** We should collect the real data rather than a made-up construct for two reasons: (1) it makes the meaning/definition of the date uniform: when the pt arrived on that unit as per ADT; if we collect it as you suggest then the meaning will be "either when they arrived or when they became our service"; so, more complicated definition, and it would re-encode something we already encode in service tmp instead. (2) If we encode some made-up date and time for unit start, then it will not link with the data in Cognos, so will always look as if not entered yet. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:50, 2020 November 18 (CST)
 }}
 ** checkbox: not used for this project <!-- was used for cross checks in data before 2020-10-15 -->