|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| == Definition == | | == Definition == |
| | | A continuous stay for a patient per site is having the same [[Visit Admit DtTm]] for the multiple encounters. |
| {{DJ | Not sure where this is used, but using [[Visit Admit DtTm]] is likely cleaner. You back-populated that for old records, so that definition would work even for old records. }}
| |
| | |
| A pair of records for the same patient is a continuous stay if: | |
| * [[Dispo DtTm]] 1 and admit2 are 5 or fewer minutes apart in the same hospital
| |
| {{Discuss | who = Julie |
| |
| * This will likely have changed when we eliminated the 5 minute rule for local transfers; Julie, could you confirm that this was also changed wherever it has an impact?
| |
| * Does this use [[Arrive DtTm]] or [[Accept DtTm]] in the new schema?
| |
| }}
| |
| * [[Dispo DtTm]] 1 and admit2 are between 30[[Transfer time rule| *]] minutes and 48 hrs apart in different hospitals
| |
| {{Discuss | who = Julie |
| |
| * Does this use [[Arrive DtTm]] or [[Accept DtTm]] in the new schema?
| |
| }}
| |
| * the combination of [[Dispo field]] field in the first the [[Service/Location field]] in the second match
| |
| * the [[Previous Location field]] in the second and the [[Service/Location field]] in the first match
| |
| * the first admission doesn't end with [[Dispo field]] = AMA
| |
| {{Discuss | who = Julie |
| |
| * That last line seems to be obvious in new schema from the other definitions... is AMA still at all relevant here or can it be taken out?
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| === Continuous encounter with intermission at non-collected ward ===
| |
| If all of
| |
| * [[Dispo field]] and [[Previous Location field]] are both <local hospital>
| |
| * [[Dispo field]] on the first record is the same as [[Previous Location field]] on the second
| |
| * the two fields are not a collected ward
| |
| then this is likely a continuous stay.
| |
| | |
| === Continuous encounter with intermission in OR ===
| |
| For ICU patient transferring to another ICU area Or ICU patient who went to OR and/or comes from OR or Recovery to an ICU between same or different hospital, the max time to consider a continuous link is <= 2days (48 hours). If more than 2 days, the next ICU admission is considered as new admission and not a transfer.
| |
| {{Discuss | who = Julie |
| |
| * would it make sense to take out the ICU requirement for this? The same might be rarer for Medicine patients but would still be true. I will implement [[Encounter processing]] like that for now unless I hear otherwise. Ttenbergen 12:06, 2015 January 22 (CST)
| |
| ** Glad you put that in Tina, I was going to make a similar comment.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 12:48, 2015 January 22 (CST)
| |
| }}
| |
|
| |
|
| === Reports using this concept === | | === Reports using this concept === |
| Which ones?
| | Used in Medicine |
|
| |
|
| === Definition used in SAS (ie in reports) === | | === Definition used in SAS (ie in reports) === |