BedHeldEnd DtTm: Difference between revisions

Line 58:

== Consistency Checks ==

We will collect this data for a month or so to have an idea what it looks like after that, we might add a cross check for complete and undeleted records such that if AMA is entered for this, [[Dispo]] must be AMA.

We will collect this data for a month or so to have an idea what it looks like after that, we might add a [[cross check]] for complete and undeleted records such that if AMA is entered for this, [[Dispo]] must be AMA.

With the current data, the converse is not true in case of AMA who signs out, as BedHeld will not be entered if pt signs out AMA following WRHA process. Once we see data we will decide if we want to add a counterpart so we can cross-check that the entry wasn't just forgotten if there is an AMA entry in [[Dispo]]. We might add an entry like AMA (protocol) to be able to ensure completion. Data for those would either have no dttm, or the same dttm as [[Dispo DtTm ], we'd have to decide.

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 == Consistency Checks ==
-We will collect this data for a month or so to have an idea what it looks like after that, we might add a cross check for complete and undeleted records such that if AMA is entered for this, [[Dispo]] must be AMA.
+We will collect this data for a month or so to have an idea what it looks like after that, we might add a [[cross check]] for complete and undeleted records such that if AMA is entered for this, [[Dispo]] must be AMA.
 With the current data, the converse is not true in case of AMA who signs out, as BedHeld will not be entered if pt signs out AMA following WRHA process. Once we see data we will decide if we want to add a counterpart so we can cross-check that the entry wasn't just forgotten if there is an AMA entry in [[Dispo]]. We might add an entry like AMA (protocol) to be able to ensure completion. Data for those would either have no dttm, or the same dttm as [[Dispo DtTm ], we'd have to decide.