Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
If no priority is assigned to a diagnosis it defaults to priority 0. This means you end up with a duplicate priorities, which in turn means that the "order" of the diagnoses is not defined. So, even though the OR Dx might list first, it is not "first" as far as Access is concerned. I will need to make the order explicit (i.e. order by priority first and by dxcode second) for both the send_dxs table and the data source for the dx form.Ttenbergen 16:57, 28 January 2010 (CST)
If no priority is assigned to a diagnosis it defaults to priority 0. This means you end up with a duplicate priorities, which in turn means that the "order" of the diagnoses is not defined. So, even though the OR Dx might list first, it is not "first" as far as Access is concerned. I will need to make the order explicit (i.e. order by priority first and by dxcode second) for both the send_dxs table and the data source for the dx form.Ttenbergen 16:57, 28 January 2010 (CST)


=== Make Pathogens listing wider ===
Right now not the whole width of items is shown. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:54, 28 January 2010 (CST)
***Is it possible to list everything alphabetically? It would just be more efficient. Perhaps this is only a laptop problem? NMiller 28 January 2010
****I believe there was some reasoning for listing the pathogens in their numbered order. Trish? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:03, 29 January 2010 (CST)


==== Can't replicate ====
{{discussion}}
I can't replicate the bug at this time. Can anyone else? low numbers seem to be accepted now, and 0s rejected. Can anyone else still sneak a legitimate value past these checks? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:53, 8 February 2010 (CST)


=== Apache Score Helper ===
=== Apache Score Helper ===