Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) →Changes Under Discussion: Suggestions requested |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
{{Discussion}} | {{Discussion}} | ||
* I made a "helper" to facilitate choosing the [[AaDO2]] for the next version. The calculation for mean BP is rather easier, so I was wondering: ICU collectors, do you think you would actually use this? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:37, 9 February 2010 (CST) | * I made a "helper" to facilitate choosing the [[AaDO2]] for the next version. The calculation for mean BP is rather easier, so I was wondering: ICU collectors, do you think you would actually use this? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 14:37, 9 February 2010 (CST) | ||
=== extra "pathogens" === | |||
As part of an effort to reduce relying on paper notes during collection, Marie brought up the possibility to put ''"waiting for tests"'' and ''"review"'' as options into the pathogen dropdown and to conditional-format the field in orange if they are chosen. Of course, choosing them would also disable checking DX complete. | |||
{{Discussion}} | |||
* Would anyone else find this useful? Should it be included in the Master DB? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:34, 9 February 2010 (CST) | |||
=== Changes to the ccmdb.mdb to reduce reliance on paper === | |||
The "extra pathogens" entry above makes me wonder: are there other features collectors can think of that would suddenly make it more desirable to enter data electronically in the first place rather than on paper? This question really only applies to the access program (e.g. to laptop users) since we are phasing out the PDAs and I am not going to make any modifications to them because they cause cascading problems. | |||
{{discussion}} | |||
* Any thoughts? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:34, 9 February 2010 (CST) | |||
== Wikis onto laptop == | == Wikis onto laptop == | ||