Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) m →Tasks |
||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
An alternative might be to automatically enter the five tasks as "blanks" for every new medicine patient. I would make 5 new tasks entries that would sort before each of the 5 existing options. This would be similar to a checklist in that the records are already there, and only would need to be edited. | An alternative might be to automatically enter the five tasks as "blanks" for every new medicine patient. I would make 5 new tasks entries that would sort before each of the 5 existing options. This would be similar to a checklist in that the records are already there, and only would need to be edited. | ||
{{discussion}} | {{discussion}} | ||
I can not think of any data or process drawbacks of doing this... can anyone else? If I hear no issues by the | I can not think of any data or process drawbacks of doing this... can anyone else? If I hear no issues by the time I get to this round of changes I will implement this.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:09, 20 October 2010 (CDT) | ||
*Do you mean they will automatically pop up as negatives ie:no trach, no hemodialysis etc. and if the pt is on anything then we would change the task to reflect this? If so I think this would help.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 14:50, 21 October 2010 (CDT) | *Do you mean they will automatically pop up as negatives ie:no trach, no hemodialysis etc. and if the pt is on anything then we would change the task to reflect this? If so I think this would help.--[[User:CMarks|CMarks]] 14:50, 21 October 2010 (CDT) | ||
** That is what I mean. Trish/Julie, do you think there would be a problem with this defaulting? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 13:20, 22 October 2010 (CDT) | |||
=== [[Patient List]] Reports for various purposes === | === [[Patient List]] Reports for various purposes === | ||