Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*Could the ARF field be changed to a "yes"/"no" or "meets"/"does not meet" the criteria, rather than the current 'check' box which is checked only if the pt meets the criteria for ARF? The current way of collecting this info can not differentiate between my having forgotten to address the issue vs the patient not having ARF. [[User:Mlaporte|Mlaporte]] 21:24, 4 March 2011 (CST) | *Could the ARF field be changed to a "yes"/"no" or "meets"/"does not meet" the criteria, rather than the current 'check' box which is checked only if the pt meets the criteria for ARF? The current way of collecting this info can not differentiate between my having forgotten to address the issue vs the patient not having ARF. [[User:Mlaporte|Mlaporte]] 21:24, 4 March 2011 (CST) | ||
** Yes, I could do that. I will need to update the data structure to do it, though, so it will need to be when I next update that file. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:58, 14 July 2011 (CDT) | ** Yes, I could do that. I will need to update the data structure to do it, though, so it will need to be when I next update that file. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:58, 14 July 2011 (CDT) | ||
== Bugs that need replicating == | |||
In order to troubleshoot bugs in the program we need to know how they happen. There are a number of articles about known bugs we are trying to fix in the [[:category:bugs | bugs category]]. Any further feedback on these bugs might be the piece of the puzzle that allows me to fix the bug. | |||
===Apache Errors remaining yellow from one patient to the next === | |||
I left myself the following note: "some Apache errors still remain yellow from one patient to the next [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:15, 2 June 2011 (CDT)". I can't even imagine now how that would be, since you would have to close one patient to open another. Does anyone else know what this was all about? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:56, 14 July 2011 (CDT) | |||
===Access allows an Admit date in the future=== | |||
{{discussion}} | |||
*We are still finding patient with admit dates in the future. For example Concordia recently sent a file with admit date of July 2011. This date is beyond current date. We thought this error was already address and entry level.--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 12:32, 9 June 2011 (CDT) | |||
** I have tried to reg-complete check data for a patient with a future discharge date and it will not let me. So, I can't duplicate this. Can anyone else show me how one might make this happen? Trish, is this a one-of, or have there been others? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 17:45, 14 July 2011 (CDT) | |||
=== WBC decimal points error === | |||
* "WBC decimal points error" - I wrote this in a meeting with Julie and Trish but can't remember what it is about; can anyone fill in? {{discussion}} [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 10:49, 3 June 2011 (CDT) | |||
=== ABG and BP Chooser Apache Points === | |||
{{discussion}} | |||
* "ApPts in BP and ABG chooser update for whole column rather than just edited line (or so, something is wrong)" I can't make this error happen. Can someone tell me what this is about? If no one has added a comment by 2011-Aug-15 this section can be deleted. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:48, 14 July 2011 (CDT) | |||
==Changes Under Discussion == | ==Changes Under Discussion == | ||