Requested CCMDB changes for the next version: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== Bugs that need replicating == | == Bugs that need replicating == | ||
In order to troubleshoot bugs in the program we need to know how they happen. There are a number of articles about known bugs we are trying to fix in the [[:category:bugs | bugs category]]. Any further feedback on these bugs might be the piece of the puzzle that allows me to fix the bug. | In order to troubleshoot bugs in the program we need to know how they happen. There are a number of articles about known bugs we are trying to fix in the [[:category:bugs | bugs category]]. Any further feedback on these bugs might be the piece of the puzzle that allows me to fix the bug. | ||
=== waiting to hear back more === | |||
===Long-stay errors === | |||
* Long-stay error for D5 may be too short '''emailed Con and Julie, waiting to hear back if can be increased from 70''' [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:37, 11 December 2011 (CST) | |||
{{discussion}} | |||
** anyone else also finding this error comes up too often? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:52, 11 December 2011 (CST) | |||
===Apache Errors remaining yellow from one patient to the next === | ===Apache Errors remaining yellow from one patient to the next === | ||
| Line 65: | Line 72: | ||
* '''Does anyone think it would be helpful if I defaulted to some priority other than 0, say 9? That if anything new was entered it would default to being less important or later, which is likely to be the case. I could likely also make it the next number after the current max, but that would probably introduce a second or two of lag time. Can anyone imagine a problem if I did this? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (CDT) | * '''Does anyone think it would be helpful if I defaulted to some priority other than 0, say 9? That if anything new was entered it would default to being less important or later, which is likely to be the case. I could likely also make it the next number after the current max, but that would probably introduce a second or two of lag time. Can anyone imagine a problem if I did this? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (CDT) | ||
**I have tried entering the priority number before the diagnosis and the pop-up still comes up and has to be cleared to proceed, if the diagnosis is a trauma post-op.--[[User:Jpeterson|Jpeterson]] 09:40, 17 October 2011 (CDT) | **I have tried entering the priority number before the diagnosis and the pop-up still comes up and has to be cleared to proceed, if the diagnosis is a trauma post-op.--[[User:Jpeterson|Jpeterson]] 09:40, 17 October 2011 (CDT) | ||
*** '''emailed Joyce Dec 7, waiting for date to meet with Joyce for her to demonstrate this[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:51, 7 December 2011 (CST) | |||
== No-Lab error when first entering a new patient == | == No-Lab error when first entering a new patient == | ||