Check ORDx: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{discussion}} | {{discussion}} | ||
* Check [[!_Automated_Data_Integrity_Checks#Q6..3F.3F_-_874_and_524_should_not_be_admitted_from_OR]] to see if this will be included here. | * Check [[!_Automated_Data_Integrity_Checks#Q6..3F.3F_-_874_and_524_should_not_be_admitted_from_OR]] to see if this will be included here. | ||
*this problem is so seldom that I don't think it is worth writing an integrity check? One error we do see is brain dead organ donors with outcome as Survived. [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 14:51, 2012 April 16 (CDT) | |||
* [[!_Automated_Data_Integrity_Checks#Q7b._These_DX_code_most_often_NOT_to_OR_for_the_procedure_so_T96_is_not_always_marked]] will need to be updated in datacleaner.mdb to draw from new table; mind you: if it will use the same data, and the same query, then what would it possibly expect to find. putting on back burner... [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:25, 24 September 2009 (CDT) | * [[!_Automated_Data_Integrity_Checks#Q7b._These_DX_code_most_often_NOT_to_OR_for_the_procedure_so_T96_is_not_always_marked]] will need to be updated in datacleaner.mdb to draw from new table; mind you: if it will use the same data, and the same query, then what would it possibly expect to find. putting on back burner... [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 15:25, 24 September 2009 (CDT) | ||