Panelling or Discharge Planning: Difference between revisions

Line 12:

** the time constraint is only for admit1[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:37, 2012 March 16 (CDT)

* ~~In another test, 906 was~~ not ~~even in admit~~ DX ~~slots~~ and I ~~was able~~ to ~~send with NO complaints from Access~~.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 14:~~25, 2012 March 15 (CDT)~~

==Discussion==

** I am not sure what you mean. You should be able to send even if you don't have a 906, no? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:37, 2012 ~~March 16~~ (CDT)

We want to change 90600 code to the following:

90601 - Panelling

90602 -discharge planning

*We currently have Panelling/discharge planning in on code which is a problem. Not easy to sort out which are clearly for Panelling in the group. Tina can you make the changes in S_alldiagnosis so we can start this begining of July. You have Master copy of ccmdb that you are working on so I dont want to change. This is not a DX but has been used as a tagged really to mark patient that where held up/delayed with discharge because of processes involved with panelling and process involved with discharge planning. You can follow up with Julie since I have discussed with her. She is trying to abstract some data for Dan, but challenging when grouped like this.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 14:55, 2012 June 22 (CDT)

[[Category: Diagnosis Coding]]

[[Category: Data Integrity Rules]]

[[Category: Trish Pending]]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ** the time constraint is only for admit1[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:37, 2012 March 16 (CDT)
-* In another test, 906 was not even in admit DX slots and I was able to send with NO complaints from Access.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 14:25, 2012 March 15 (CDT)
+==Discussion==
-** I am not sure what you mean. You should be able to send even if you don't have a 906, no? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:37, 2012 March 16 (CDT)
+{{Discussion}}
+We want to change 90600 code to the following:
+- Panelling
+-discharge planning
+*We currently have Panelling/discharge planning in on code which is a problem.  Not easy to sort out which are clearly for Panelling in the group.  Tina can you make the changes in S_alldiagnosis so we can start this begining of July.  You have Master copy of ccmdb that you are working on so I dont want to change. This is not a DX but has been used as a tagged really to mark patient that where held up/delayed with discharge because of processes involved with panelling and process involved with discharge planning.  You can follow up with Julie since I have discussed with her.  She is trying to abstract some data for Dan, but challenging when grouped like this.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 14:55, 2012 June 22 (CDT)
 [[Category: Diagnosis Coding]]
 [[Category: Data Integrity Rules]]
 [[Category: Trish Pending]]