Overstay Predictor Project Collection Instructions: Difference between revisions

inappropriate reds: likely not inappropriate red in this case
Line 111: Line 111:


=== inappropriate reds ===
=== inappropriate reds ===
Please re-create colours for patients entered between Sat Feb 9 and Wed Feb 13!
*'''STB'''-inappropriate REDS being generated.  ID by Debbie this week.  Unble to connect with Tina on Feb 11 & 12th.
*'''STB'''-inappropriate REDS being generated.  ID by Debbie this week.  Unble to connect with Tina on Feb 11 & 12th.
*'''STB'''-I found a patient that was flagged red that should not be. The ADL's were all unassisted. The admit diagnosis & ccm were not any of the flagged diagnosis. The living arrangment was house. For questions 1-6, only question 2 (falls) was a no. The patient was flagged red. This is very inappropriate. The transition coordinators will not be happy if we are now going to start coming up with inappropriate reds for them. [[User:DPageNewton|DPageNewton]] 14:44, 2013 February 12 (EST)   
*'''STB'''-I found a patient that was flagged red that should not be. The ADL's were all unassisted. The admit diagnosis & ccm were not any of the flagged diagnosis. The living arrangment was house. For questions 1-6, only question 2 (falls) was a no. The patient was flagged red. This is very inappropriate. The transition coordinators will not be happy if we are now going to start coming up with inappropriate reds for them. [[User:DPageNewton|DPageNewton]] 14:44, 2013 February 12 (EST)   
*'''STB''' I have come across another (second) patient that I think is inappropriately assigned a red color. As of this moment I will NOT be entering these names in the transition coordinator binder, until such time as this issue is sorted out. As data collectors we are told we must adhere to strict guidelines as to time frame for work done. It is more than a little frustrating that these issues are not addressed and attended to in the same strict time frame guidelines. This delay in addressing issues in turn will affect the time frame for our assigning opp colors. Serial #'s for the two patients I think are inappropriately assigned red are SBGH E5 #'s 9683 & 9684. [[User:DPageNewton|DPageNewton]] 19:00, 2013 February 12 (EST)  
*'''STB''' I have come across another (second) patient that I think is inappropriately assigned a red color. As of this moment I will NOT be entering these names in the transition coordinator binder, until such time as this issue is sorted out. As data collectors we are told we must adhere to strict guidelines as to time frame for work done. It is more than a little frustrating that these issues are not addressed and attended to in the same strict time frame guidelines. This delay in addressing issues in turn will affect the time frame for our assigning opp colors. Serial #'s for the two patients I think are inappropriately assigned red are SBGH E5 #'s 9683 & 9684. [[User:DPageNewton|DPageNewton]] 19:00, 2013 February 12 (EST)  
** '''There were several problems with colour generation in ver 2013-02-04; ver 2013-02-13 should correct these. Again, if you see more colour ratings that seem wrong, please let me know Ttenbergen 10:54, 2013 February 14 (EST)
** '''There were several problems with colour generation in ver 2013-02-04; ver 2013-02-13 should correct these. Again, if you see more colour ratings that seem wrong, please let me know Ttenbergen 10:54, 2013 February 14 (EST)
Please re-create colours for patients entered between Sat Feb 9 and Wed Feb 13!
*STB E5_Serial # 9688 is still a RED, with new version rolled out today as per Debbie Page Newton email today.-[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:10, 2013 February 14 (EST)
** checked into, likely correct red due to a dementia dx, which is one of the strongest factors in the new model. Ttenbergen 21:50, 2013 February 14 (EST)


==== red from PCH ====
==== red from PCH ====