Trach Task: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) →Will anyone ever be counted as "acute" if collected according to these rules?: need to resolve question before any checks can be implemented |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Proposed: Trach task vs Dx == | == Proposed: Trach task vs Dx == | ||
This was requested as a check for [[CFE]],but if we actually do it it should really be in [[CCMDB.mdb]] instead. | |||
* need to create: Med DX [[Tracheostomy]] 77400 but Trach Not in Task | * need to create: Med DX [[Tracheostomy]] 77400 but Trach Not in Task | ||
** presumably this is not only the 00 subdx we need... | ** presumably this is not only the 00 subdx we need... {{discussion}} | ||
* need to create: Med_Task_has_trach but no [[Tracheostomy]] | * need to create: Med_Task_has_trach but no [[Tracheostomy]] | ||
If these always coincide then why do we collect a task at all? Ttenbergen 10:51, 2014 September 25 (CDT) | |||
{{discussion}} | |||
If these always coincide then why do we collect a task at all? Ttenbergen 10:51, 2014 September 25 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:54, 25 September 2014
Task items replaced iTISS as a sampler of specific "nursing workload" items that the medicine program continues to track as QA indicators.
Only mark a task as performed if it was done during a patients stay on your ward. If a task was done prior to patient coming to your ward or after patient is transferred to another ward, it should be marked as no or none during the stay on your ward.
These items are included in: S_AllDiagnoses table which can be found in CCMDB.mdb.
Trach Task
Possible entries for Tracheostomy task:
- 100100 - Trach None
- 100101 - Trach Acute-1st 48 hrs (new trach)
- 100102 - Trach Chronic-more than 48 hrs
Template:Data Integrity Checks
Proposed: Trach task vs Dx
This was requested as a check for CFE,but if we actually do it it should really be in CCMDB.mdb instead.
- need to create: Med DX Tracheostomy 77400 but Trach Not in Task
- presumably this is not only the 00 subdx we need... Template:Discussion
- need to create: Med_Task_has_trach but no Tracheostomy
Template:Discussion If these always coincide then why do we collect a task at all? Ttenbergen 10:51, 2014 September 25 (CDT)
Will anyone ever be counted as "acute" if collected according to these rules?
- The problem is that in the "rules" the pt must have had the trach procedure done while on the ward, which rarely happens. The "acute" rule only applies if it is a trach done in the last 48 hours which could happen. I think that the collectors are counting all the trach patients whether the trach was done while on the ward or not, according to the numbers. I do not see the value in whether it is acute or chronic because we no longer even do this in the ICU tiss. I think there is more value in whether it is a temporary trach or permanent trach. (Just a suggestion).--LKolesar 15:02, 2013 May 8 (EDT)
- This entire article does not make sense. By this definition no one on a medical ward would have a trach task marked. By this definition, a pt that gets a trach while in the ICU would not get the task marked when they are transferred to medicine. Trach task, in my opinion, should be marked if a pt has a trach no matter when they got the trach or where. (It is a nursing workload issue). Also, instead of the terms acute and chronic, it should be temporary or permanent for the options. Medicine collectors please let me know how you deal with this task.--LKolesar 10:01, 2013 May 8 (EDT)
- interesting point. Just had a quick look, here are the numbers: File:Trach entry counts.JPG
- Trish, Julie, Laura: do these make sense in light of what Laura just said? Ttenbergen 13:15, 2013 May 8 (EDT)
- I think everyone interprets the task trach to mean trach care, not trach insertion, otherwise we would not have the numbers that we do. I don't mind making this clear in the instructions if this is the intent of this task. Let me know. --LKolesar 11:24, 2013 May 9 (EDT)
- need to resolve this before any checks can be implemented. Ttenbergen 10:52, 2014 September 25 (CDT)