VIC EMIP: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

* {{discussion}} Is there any reason not to enter these into CCMDB and then use the MR list printing rather than manually write on paper? That way we already have basic info and there is no double work. Ttenbergen 10:44, 2015 October 29 (CDT)

** Sometimes the information is incorrect and you can be entering a patient who should not be included into the database because the service was only consulted, not admitted so you have to look into the chart and check it out first. It is easier this way. Unless we can just enter the names directly into the MR list?

*** No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen 14:55, 2015 November 5 (CST)

*** No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:49, 2015 November 18 (CST)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 * {{discussion}} Is there any reason not to enter these into CCMDB and then use the MR list printing rather than manually write on paper? That way we already have basic info and there is no double work. Ttenbergen 10:44, 2015 October 29 (CDT)
 ** Sometimes the information is incorrect and you can be entering a patient who should not be included into the database because the service was only consulted, not admitted so you have to look into the chart and check it out first. It is easier this way. Unless we can just enter the names directly into the MR list?
-*** No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen 14:55, 2015 November 5 (CST)
+*** No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:49, 2015 November 18 (CST)