VIC EMIP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) (entering on suspicion rather than only on confirmation...) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) (what proportion is false positive?) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* {{discussion}} Is there any reason not to enter these into CCMDB and then use the MR list printing rather than manually write on paper? That way we already have basic info and there is no double work. Ttenbergen 10:44, 2015 October 29 (CDT) | * {{discussion}} Is there any reason not to enter these into CCMDB and then use the MR list printing rather than manually write on paper? That way we already have basic info and there is no double work. Ttenbergen 10:44, 2015 October 29 (CDT) | ||
** Sometimes the information is incorrect and you can be entering a patient who should not be included into the database because the service was only consulted, not admitted so you have to look into the chart and check it out first. It is easier this way. Unless we can just enter the names directly into the MR list? | ** Sometimes the information is incorrect and you can be entering a patient who should not be included into the database because the service was only consulted, not admitted so you have to look into the chart and check it out first. It is easier this way. Unless we can just enter the names directly into the MR list? | ||
*** No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen | *** No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:49, 2015 November 18 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 2015 November 18
| Location | |
| Location | VIC EMIP |
| First Admission | February 1, 2007 |
| Program | Medicine |
| Hospital | VIC |
| Nr of Beds | not entered |
| Collection Unit Phone: | |
| Collection Unit Fax : | |
| Collection Unit Manager : | {{{Collection Unit Manager }}} |
| Collection Unit Manager Phone : | {{{Collection Unit Manager Phone}}} |
| Collection Unit Clerk : | {{{Collection Unit Clerk }}} |
VIC_EMIP is the Vic location entry for EMIP.
- CTU S4 Medicine data collectors enters EMIPs on CTU S4 laptop.
- Must go to Medical Records and ask for the Monthly Admit/Discharge binder**( 'Bed Census Services Report) Find Clients who are under CTU Doctors (we have a list in office) and who are discharged from Emergency (either home or transferred to another facility) Write down name and chart number with discharge date and time. Give list to medical record staff. EMIP binder with serial log numbers kept in office G126 Rehab Enter EMIPs in CTU S4 laptop When reading charts make sure client is admitted to medicine service. Now with EPR the chart will be incomplete because emergency doesnt print their sheets so you will have to access EPR and find the information ie VS, admit to CTU, ectect Check the binder every couple of weeks and initial where you have checked, so the next person is aware. or leave a date in the binder in the office.
- Template:Discussion Is there any reason not to enter these into CCMDB and then use the MR list printing rather than manually write on paper? That way we already have basic info and there is no double work. Ttenbergen 10:44, 2015 October 29 (CDT)
- Sometimes the information is incorrect and you can be entering a patient who should not be included into the database because the service was only consulted, not admitted so you have to look into the chart and check it out first. It is easier this way. Unless we can just enter the names directly into the MR list?
- No, afraid we can't just enter into the MR list. What proportion of patients is usually the "false positive" you describe? If <20%, I'd say enter and delete if they really did not qualify. That would cause a gab in serials but that really doesn't matter. Trish/Pagasa/Julie, any thoughts? Ttenbergen 16:49, 2015 November 18 (CST)
- Sometimes the information is incorrect and you can be entering a patient who should not be included into the database because the service was only consulted, not admitted so you have to look into the chart and check it out first. It is easier this way. Unless we can just enter the names directly into the MR list?