ACP Status Collection in ICU: Difference between revisions

Line 27:

==Question==

*Once a pt arrives in the ICU who was previously an inpatient on the ward, do you want the previous ACP status before the ICU admission documented or do we just start with the first ACP status decided on admission to the ICU and then any documented changes thereafter? For example if a pt was "R" on the ward and on arrival to the ICU after discussion, it is changed to "M-": should I put the "R" and the "M-", or just start with the "M-" and document any changes after that? Because this project relates to the ICU admission, I just wanted this clarified. --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 13:40, 2016 May 4 (CDT)

**All ACP documentations during the same hospitalization will now be collected if available. The QI Team would like the ACP status at 3 time periods namely, i) at PRE-ICU, ii) at admission and iii) at discharge. Since the date is being collected, I will assign the ACP status to each time period by programming. For this example, there are 2 entries of ACP documentation by data collector.

***First:

**** Project='ACP status', Item='ACP R', Date_var= date1 before ICU admit date

****Project='ACP Source', Item='Form', Date_var=date1 before ICU admit date

***Second:

****Project='ACP status', Item='ACP M-', Date_var= date2 (arrival date at ICU)

****Project='ACP Source', Item='Form', Date_var=date2(arrival date at ICU)

***The ACP Status assignment via program codes will be PRE-ICU='ACP_R', Admit_ACP='M-', Disch_ACP='M-'(if no more new form)

[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:06, 2016 May 4 (CDT)

=== If there is no ACP documentation ===

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 ==Question==
 *Once a pt arrives in the ICU who was previously an inpatient on the ward, do you want the previous ACP status before the ICU admission documented or do we just start with the first ACP status decided on admission to the ICU and then any documented changes thereafter?  For example if a pt was "R" on the ward and on arrival to the ICU after discussion, it is changed to "M-":  should I put the "R" and the "M-", or just start with the "M-" and document any changes after that?  Because this project relates to the ICU admission, I just wanted this clarified.  --[[User:LKolesar|LKolesar]] 13:40, 2016 May 4 (CDT)
+**All ACP documentations during the same hospitalization will now be collected if available. The QI Team would like the ACP status at 3 time periods namely, i) at PRE-ICU, ii) at admission and iii) at discharge. Since the date is being collected, I will assign the ACP status to each time period by programming. For this example, there are 2 entries of ACP documentation by data collector.
+***First:
+**** Project='ACP status', Item='ACP R',  Date_var= date1 before ICU admit date
+****Project='ACP Source', Item='Form',   Date_var=date1 before ICU admit date
+***Second:
+****Project='ACP status', Item='ACP M-', Date_var= date2 (arrival date at ICU)
+****Project='ACP Source', Item='Form',   Date_var=date2(arrival date at ICU)
+***The ACP Status assignment via program codes will be PRE-ICU='ACP_R', Admit_ACP='M-', Disch_ACP='M-'(if no more new form)
+[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 17:06, 2016 May 4 (CDT)
 === If there is no ACP documentation ===