ECIP: Difference between revisions
TOstryzniuk (talk | contribs) m m |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include. I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU. | :Now that we have the ERP Reports, we can find things like this however, we need to discuss if value to ICU database to include. I know everyone is interested in patient flow and I was previously told that there is not that much delay when ICU attending accept patient, then when they are transferred to ICU. But there are a number we have seeing that sit it ER under ICU attending in one center then go from that ER to another site ICU. | ||
:Also have ICU pt in ER under attending for 8 hrs, then they are transferred to continuing care at HSC. Not sure what continuing care is. Perhaps this is the | :Also have ICU pt in ER under attending for 8 hrs, then they are transferred to continuing care at HSC. Not sure what continuing care is. Perhaps this is the [[HSC CAU]]? | ||
*The [[HSC_CAU]] is under emergency medicine service. No patient are ever under internal medicine service in this area. This is not an inpatient location as confirmed by [[p:Con Marks]], [[p:Louise Lemoine]]. This model of care will probably change. [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 17:44, 2017 September 29 (CDT) | |||
[[Category:EMIP]] | [[Category:EMIP]] | ||