|
|
| (15 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| All *CAU entries for incomplete pts were changed to *ward entries, and the *CAU entries in [[S dispo table]] were retired. | | All *CAU entries for incomplete pts were changed to *ward entries, and the *CAU entries in [[S dispo table]] were retired. |
|
| |
|
| {{Discuss | who = Tina|
| | On discussion with Julie it was decided to keep the s_dispo entries around and not convert them. The loc type is Ward in s_dispo which is enough when reporting - usually being combined as <site> ward. |
| * Do you care if we keep the old entries around, or do you want them converted to plain *Ward entries to show up differently in any reporting you do? If fine as is then we should set this page (and the local equivalents) to Legacy. If you want to convert, we can do that and then delete the old CAU pages.
| |
| ** No need to change the CAU to ward. The loc type is Ward in s_dispo which is enough when reporting - usually being combined as <site> ward. fine to be as legacy.--[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 16:51, 2022 January 26 (CST)
| |
| | |
| }}
| |
| | |
| == [[Boarding Loc]] entries ==
| |
| With [[Change of GRA location names from "our" names to EPR/Cognos names]] and patients boarding in CAU, there are some [[Boarding Loc]] of "GH-CAU". This should not really cause any problems, just documenting it here.
| |
| | |
| {{Collapsable
| |
| | always= SQL
| |
| | full=
| |
| SELECT L_TmpV2.*
| |
| FROM L_TmpV2
| |
| WHERE (((L_TmpV2.Project)="Boarding Loc") AND ((L_TmpV2.Item)="GH-CAU"));
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| == Currrent state in CFE ==
| |
| {{Collapsable
| |
| | always= See sql to see dispo or boarding loc CAUs in CFE
| |
| | full=
| |
| Query:
| |
| SELECT L_Log.D_ID, s_dispo.location_name AS pre_admit, s_dispo_1.location_name AS previous, s_dispo_2.location_name AS SL, s_dispo_3.location_name AS dispo, tmp_CAU.Item, L_Log.Accept_DtTm, L_Log.Arrive_DtTm, L_Log.Dispo_DtTm, L_Log.RecordStatus
| |
| FROM ((((L_Log LEFT JOIN s_dispo ON L_Log.Pre_admit_Inpatient_Institution = s_dispo.dispo_ID) LEFT JOIN s_dispo AS s_dispo_1 ON L_Log.Previous_Location = s_dispo_1.dispo_ID) LEFT JOIN s_dispo AS s_dispo_2 ON L_Log.Service_Location = s_dispo_2.dispo_ID) LEFT JOIN s_dispo AS s_dispo_3 ON L_Log.Dispo = s_dispo_3.dispo_ID) LEFT JOIN (SELECT L_TmpV2.* FROM L_TmpV2 WHERE (((L_TmpV2.Item) Like "*CAU"))) AS tmp_CAU ON L_Log.D_ID = tmp_CAU.D_ID
| |
| WHERE (((s_dispo.location_name) Like "*CAU")) OR (((s_dispo_1.location_name) Like "*CAU")) OR (((s_dispo_2.location_name) Like "*CAU")) OR (((s_dispo_3.location_name) Like "*CAU"));
| |
| }}
| |
| | |
| == pre-admit inpt... ==
| |
| A quick review of the data shows that collectors are using CAUs even now. Possibly more concerningly, when CAU is the [[Previous Location]] , about 5% coded the pre-admit location as NA/Not applicable, the rest coded it as same CAU, except for a few who are mixing CAU and ER in these.
| |
| | |
| {{Discuss | who = Julie |
| |
| * Do we need to correct these old inconsistencies? [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 11:09, 2021 May 5 (CDT)
| |
| }}
| |
|
| |
|
| == Related articles == | | == Related articles == |