1Backup.bat: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
made legacy |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a legacy article only. Medicine is no longer being backed up because no longer used. Centralized backup gets taken care of by the [[Pull down centralized data.vbs]] and [[Push up centralized data.vbs]] scripts instead. | |||
---- | |||
1Backup.bat is a batch file created by [[Tina Tenbergen]] that calls several other batch files that should be run together: | 1Backup.bat is a batch file created by [[Tina Tenbergen]] that calls several other batch files that should be run together: | ||
* [[Centralized backup.bat]] | * [[Centralized backup.bat]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
Lives:? | Lives:? | ||
* Sorry.....I can't run to 3 different articles to find out where to log files lives for this batch file. Nice to see where it lives in this article. Had issues the other day and Pagasa has gone and we can't find it on Wiki. [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:46, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | * Sorry.....I can't run to 3 different articles to find out where to log files lives for this batch file. Nice to see where it lives in this article. Had issues the other day and Pagasa has gone and we can't find it on Wiki. [[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:46, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | ||
** I understand your point, but these are three different batch files that were grouped for convenience. Duplication of info on wiki - nuff said. If there is never a reason to run the batch files separately we could combine the actual files, in which case the log info would also be addressed in one place. However, considering that the whole concept will change once we move from Ed's I think we should just leave this as is for now. After the traffic relating to this over the last few days we should likely re-visit. However, it would be nice to have Pagasa's process documentation up-to-date first so we can make sure the automation fits as well as possible. Ttenbergen 21:57, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | ** I understand your point, but these are three different batch files that were grouped for convenience. Duplication of info on wiki - nuff said. If there is never a reason to run the batch files separately we could combine the actual files, in which case the log info would also be addressed in one place. However, considering that the whole concept will change once we move from Ed's I think we should just leave this as is for now. After the traffic relating to this over the last few days we should likely re-visit. However, it would be nice to have Pagasa's process documentation up-to-date first so we can make sure the automation fits as well as possible. Ttenbergen 21:57, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | ||
[[Category: Data processing batch files]] | [[Category: Legacy Data processing batch files]] | ||
[[Category: 2013 data upgrades]] | [[Category: 2013 data upgrades]] | ||