|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Reporting Indicators | | {{Reporting Indicators |
| | description = Indicator of help needed with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) | | |description=Indicator of help needed with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) |
| | indicator_name = ADL Score
| | |indicator_start_date=2003-10-01 |
| | created_raw = Created
| | |indicator_name=ADL Score |
| | program = Medicine
| | |program=Medicine |
| | indicator_start_date = 2003-10-01 | |
| | indicator_end_date = | |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
| This score is derived from the individual [[#ADL Components]] collected following general collection instructions in [[ADL General Collection Information]] and component-specific criteria defined on the individual component pages listed below. | | This score is derived from the individual [[#ADL Components]] collected following general collection instructions in [[ADL General Collection Information]] and component-specific criteria defined on the individual component pages listed below. |
|
| |
|
| {{DJ |
| |
| * It looks like the original Katz ADL uses high scores for good functioning, but our modified one with the intermediate value uses low ones. That isn't intuitive and users of our data might expect otherwise. Am I off in left field on this? If not we should document this explicitly. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:32, 24 April 2025 (CDT)
| |
| **it is documented below under Data Use. we can make it as a separate sub-category if you want it explicit. --[[User:JMojica|JMojica]] 13:18, 24 April 2025 (CDT)
| |
| *** I think the meaning of the data needs to be either right at the top or at least in the how it's derived. People hunt and scan documentation rather than read the whole thing, and I don't thin they would expect the basic definition of an item under data use. The binned reporting you also have down there, that belongs under data use in my opinion, but the info about the raw info should be higher. I have made the change, feel free to tweak to make sure it also makes sense to anyone linking from a report.
| |
| ** Good eye, Tina. but will it matter 6 to 0 or 0 to 6, if we specify the scores we have used. I just remember the University grading system here in Canada, 5 - highest and 1 - worst. In the Phil the grading system 1-highest and 5 - worst. I have to adjust my brain when I got my first semester grades.
| |
| *** Same in DE, best grade is a 1 and worst a 6, 5 and below fail. Or that's what it was when I was in school there, who knows what it is now... [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:25, 28 April 2025 (CDT)
| |
| * if you are good with this after my edit feel free to delete the discussion [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 12:25, 28 April 2025 (CDT)
| |
| }}
| |
|
| |
|
| == How is this derived == | | == How is this derived == |