Acquired Diagnosis / Complication: Difference between revisions

Line 22:

** Trish, I think the way I cleaned up the main section of this article means that the max # of points possible will be collected. This would mean that Wendy's concern is addressed, correct? If you agree, please remove this section. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:58, 2 November 2010 (CDT)

***I don't know what you mean by point for complications?--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:32, 3 November 2010 (CDT)

**** I meant that, with the changes I had made to the instructions, the most important complications would be the ones that would stay. Specifically, that as you run out of spots you delete the ones that are not as important so that we get the most importand complications within the limited number of spots available, rather than the original instructions to be entirely chronological. This still isn't a good way to do this; one way to fix would be to wait for the new repository with unlimited # of complications, another would be to add a column to prioritize s_alldxs into groups of prioirties for the dx (vs priorities for the ''collected'' dx), so that I could sort the list first by priority and then chronologically (would not work if we use the fact that the list is currently chronological for anything). This is a bit of a messy explanation, call if you want to talk about it.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:56, 4 November 2010 (CDT)

== should it be "acquired diagnoses" or "complications"? ==

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 ** Trish, I think the way I cleaned up the main section of this article means that the max # of points possible will be collected. This would mean that Wendy's concern is addressed, correct? If you agree, please remove this section. [[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 16:58, 2 November 2010 (CDT)
 ***I don't know what you mean by point for complications?--[[User:TOstryzniuk|TOstryzniuk]] 17:32, 3 November 2010 (CDT)
+**** I meant that, with the changes I had made to the instructions, the most important complications would be the ones that would stay. Specifically, that as you run out of spots you delete the ones that are not as important so that we get the most importand complications within the limited number of spots available, rather than the original instructions to be entirely chronological. This still isn't a good way to do this; one way to fix would be to wait for the new repository with unlimited # of complications, another would be to add a column to prioritize s_alldxs into groups of prioirties for the dx (vs priorities for the ''collected'' dx), so that I could sort the list first by priority and then chronologically (would not work if we use the fact that the list is currently chronological for anything). This is a bit of a messy explanation, call if you want to talk about it.[[User:Ttenbergen|Ttenbergen]] 09:56, 4 November 2010 (CDT)
 == should it be "acquired diagnoses" or "complications"? ==