Change Priorities: Difference between revisions

Line 12:

#Centralized - the diagnosis code for ACUTE PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (TASK) should be changed from 1003201 to 100301. [[Julie Mojica]] as per email sent April 30.14.

# ED’s has 8 '''missing''' CH data (due to missing APACHE elements – same with ES)[[Chronic Health APACHE]]. Centralized_data - assigns data to the missing 8 cases. These should have been treated as MISSING in the '''centralized data'''. [[Julie Mojica]]as per email sent: April 30.14.

# ~~adjustments (~~in ~~bracket) to [[APACHE Scoring table]] done on APRIL 23~~.~~14 (see edit history). Would~~ need to ~~check and update centralized~~ front end.

#Updated Apache scoring in CCMDB.mdb, still need to import to Centralized front end

~~#*AaDo: 201(200)-349~~

~~#*PO2: 61-69 (70)~~

~~#*CO2: <=14 ((<15)~~

~~#*PH: <=7.14 (<7.15)~~

~~#*K: <=2.4 (<2.5)~~

~~#*HCT: <=19.9 (<20)~~

~~#*WBC: <0.9 (<1)~~

#[[Bug - Incomplete patients are being set to "sent" in Centralized data.mdb]] - likely fixed

#L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter. For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way. Example: filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different. Review with Pagasa. Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter. Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick. I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 #Centralized - the diagnosis code for ACUTE PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (TASK) should be changed from 1003201 to 100301.  [[Julie Mojica]] as per email sent April 30.14.
 # ED’s has 8 '''missing''' CH data (due to missing  APACHE elements – same with ES)[[Chronic Health APACHE]]. Centralized_data  - assigns data to the missing 8 cases.   These should have been treated as MISSING in the '''centralized data'''. [[Julie Mojica]]as per email sent: April 30.14.
-# adjustments (in bracket) to [[APACHE Scoring table]] done on APRIL 23.14 (see edit history). Would need to check and update centralized front end.
+#Updated Apache scoring in CCMDB.mdb, still need to import to Centralized front end
-#*AaDo: 201(200)-349
-#*PO2: 61-69 (70)
-#*CO2: <=14 ((<15)
-#*PH: <=7.14 (<7.15)
-#*K: <=2.4 (<2.5)
-#*HCT: <=19.9 (<20)
-#*WBC: <0.9 (<1)
 #[[Bug - Incomplete patients are being set to "sent" in Centralized data.mdb]] - likely fixed
 #L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter.  For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way.  Example:  filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different.  Review with Pagasa.  Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter.  Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick.  I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT)