Change Priorities: Difference between revisions
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) |
Ttenbergen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Trish please fill from [[:Category:Potential Change]] as you see fit. | Trish please fill from [[:Category:Potential Change]] as you see fit. | ||
#L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter. For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way. Example: filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different. Review with Pagasa. Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter. Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick. I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | #L_Log - we don't understand the logic why there is a difference "counts" when you sort and filter and don't sort and filter. For For example, we have to sort record status field first before we filter, otherwise not counting all the same way. Example: filter by vetted without sorting this field first and counts are different. Review with Pagasa. Both Julie and Trish getting error because we don't know why you have to sort before you filter. Pagasa only one that know this trick. Why should here be this trick. I guess we don't understand what Access is doing or we expect it should be doing something regardless doing it in this order.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 20:21, 2014 April 30 (CDT) | ||
# NDC for centralized front end - VAP AND CLI. Check with Pagasa. | # NDC for centralized front end - VAP AND CLI. Check with Pagasa. | ||
# How to deal with Orphan in centralized. There are 55 showing up again. Review with Pagasa.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:06, 2014 April 11 (CDT) | # How to deal with Orphan in centralized. There are 55 showing up again. Review with Pagasa.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 18:06, 2014 April 11 (CDT) | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
#Updated Apache scoring in CCMDB.mdb, still need to import to Centralized front end | #Updated Apache scoring in CCMDB.mdb, still need to import to Centralized front end | ||
#[[Bug - Incomplete patients are being set to "sent" in Centralized data.mdb]] - likely fixed | #[[Bug - Incomplete patients are being set to "sent" in Centralized data.mdb]] - likely fixed | ||
# P_Outstanding_Admits would like the Incompletes with NO discharge date.[[User:TOstryzniuk|Trish Ostryzniuk]] 19:54, 2014 April 25 (CDT) | |||
#* added a field "has_discharge_date"; Trish updating [[Pivot table for centralized]] to reflect. Ttenbergen 19:58, 2014 May 1 (CDT) | |||
== To do before go-life == | == To do before go-life == | ||