St.Amant

St.Amant supports over 5,000 people in Manitoba with developmental disabilities, autism and acquired brain injury. They provide a variety of services, but in the context of our data collection we are usually considering their residential program.

They used to provide full residential care in their facility. Most has been used to other living arrangements (see community residential program), but when we looked into this in 2024 we found it still reasonable to keep this option as a Chronic Health Facility.

Pre acute living situation: Chronic Health Facility

	Is that actually true, that we use the code for patients in one of their residential programs? Would we even know the patient is, considering many are now set up as home-stays or group homes? Or do we only collect this for people who actually live there, if there is still such a thing? Ttenbergen 15:40, 29 October 2025 (CDT) I ran a query to check and

Previous Location / Dispo: "St Amant Center" , categorized as PCH

Are we coding this consistently

	Since 2022: Pre acute living situation for patients where Dispo is St Amant has been recorded as: 23 Chronic Health Facility 14 Community Facility with support 5 Personal Care Home 2 House 1 other - known but not listed 1 Apartment Pre acute living situation for patients where Previous Location is St Amant has been recorded as: 1 Apartment 1 Personal Care Home How are we using this code, and how should we use it? Ttenbergen 16:07, 29 October 2025 (CDT)

Log

2024-12-03 - reviewed that it still makes sense to include this as a Chronic Health Facility

2008-01-31 re-added because it went missing
2008-01-25 initial addition as an admit / discharge location